Highland Park ISD Bans Books Because Sex

banned_books_ala.jpg
American Library Association
We're not sure all Highland Park parents understand exactly what celebrating banned books week means.

Highland Park High School announced it would be suspending seven books from the high school reading list, just in time for Banned Books Week. So what's wrong with the books? Each of the seven, award-winning texts feature themes about sexuality or include passages that some parents find too racy.

See also: Park Cities Parents Want Their Kids to Read the Classics, Not These Newfangled Porn Novels

Highland Park parents first raised their objections to the "Recommended Outside Reading" list last spring. The list contains more than 250 titles, and is a supplement to classroom required reading. The Approved List includes ROR titles, summer reading, and classroom curriculum. Each book must go through a review process through a selection committee, which is composed of parents and teachers. The seven books that have been suspended from the list will undergo another review process that, The Dallas Morning News reports, could take several months.

Highland Park High School Principal Walter Kelly had previously expressed his support for contemporary literature in the classroom. "We don't want to deny students access to certain piece of literature just because it hasn't gone through decades of review," Kelly said just a few months ago.

"Parents always have the option to refuse having their kids read a book, and it's our responsibility to provide an alternative work," Kelly said in July. "If a parent disagrees, they can request that the book is removed from the list. And for those books that are questionable, the department does send home a note."

Now, Highland Park HS has temporarily removed the objectionable books from the list for all students. Kelly sent out a statement on Monday that acknowledged the parents' objections. "I understand that some of the choices made within our school jeopardized the trust that some families have in us," he said. "When we discover problems, we work to remedy them in good faith."

The primary objection to the books were sexual references and promiscuity: Herman Hesse's Siddhartha, Garth Stein's The Art of Racing in the Rain, and John Green's An Abundance of Katherines each took the ax last week. Parents cited explicit passages and promiscuous content. Jodi Picoult's Nineteen Minutes and Stephen Chbosky's The Perks of Being a Wallflower had already been removed from the list earlier this summer after coming under parental criticism.

Highland Park is hardly alone: Each of the seven books have been frequently banned in districts across the country. In addition to sexually overt rhetoric, two of the banned books also feature prominent minority perspectives: Nobel prize-winning author Toni Morrison's Song of Solomon and Sherman Alexie's National Book Award-winning The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian.

In addition, two suspended selections tell stories of poverty and financial hardship: Pulitzer-prize winning journalist David K. Shipler's The Working Poor: Invisible in America and Jeannette Walls' memoir, The Glass Castle. Oddly enough, Walls is scheduled to appear at the Highland Park Literary Festival in February.

My Voice Nation Help
59 comments
TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

Applebee's used to have a good shrimp salad on their menu, then they banned it.

becks
becks

John Green has posted about this on his Tumblr.  Removing "An Abundance of Katherines" is ridiculous (as is removing any of these books):


"This case seems especially enlightening to me because there are so few “dirty” or “controversial” parts in An Abundance of Katherines. I mean, it’s a buddy novel about two best friends who literally use the word “fug” in lieu of the word “fuck,” and who when they curse, do so mostly in Arabic or German. Is the non-English cursing the issue? It it the book’s abundance of abstract mathematics? Its misplacement of the tomb of Archduke Franz Ferdinand? The fact that one of the central characters is a Muslim?  I really don’t know. And it’s not clear to me that the school districts that have banned the book have a particularly good handle on the “why” of it either. "

lzippitydoo
lzippitydoo

Next - they will ban Dr Seuss at the Kindergarten level. Don't these bonehead parents have anything better to do??

bmarvel
bmarvel topcommenter

I'm all for banning books. How else are you gong to get kids to read them?

JFPO
JFPO

"The Working Poor: Invisible in America"


Invisible in Highland Park, anyway. There is no reason to expose privileged, white trust fund children to this. Parkies know that the poor are simply inferior.

roo_ster
roo_ster

If you use taxpayer dollars to pay for the schools, expect those grubby taxpayers to expect a say in what goes on. 

fordamist
fordamist

The Smut Snatchers of GREATER TUNA pioneered the idea,  cleaning up the books at Tuna High,  if parents don't want their kids learning a word,  put it on the list.


"We feel ROOTS only shows one side of the slavery issue!"


"If we add 'snatch' to the list,  we'll have to change our name."


"I knew there'd be trouble over 'snatch',  there always is ..."



Cliffhanger
Cliffhanger

As Hemingway said of his hometown, I say of mine: "it is a city of broad lawns and narrow minds."

bmarvel
bmarvel topcommenter

Because, God knows, Highland Park kids don't know anything about sex. And we want to keep them that way.

J_A_
J_A_

I learn so much about HP from this blog

TheCredibleHulk
TheCredibleHulk topcommenter

Next thing you know, they're gonna' figure out you can find porn on the internet.

sherismith
sherismith

this crusade is really watermark church getting their ultra religious conservative members to lie to an entire school district about their true agenda.  these women are crafty, they started with the elementary parents and published some scandalous exerts from books, most of the books not on ANY reading list, and told the elementary parents this was required reading.  lies, lies and more lies.  of course the elementary parents flipped about the prospect of their babies reading smut.  no high school parents were ever included in any meetings or emails, in fact their were carefully excluded because they know the truth and DO NOT SUPPORT THE BOOK BANNING AGENDA. 99% of HP is against the ban.  in complete shock that Orr caved so quickly, not his normal fearless, bring it on attitude.

manpanties
manpanties

that siddartha is sure to make your pants go crazy.

ScottsMerkin
ScottsMerkin topcommenter

There's no sex in the Champagne Room

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

Did they "ban" the dictionary at UP?

everlastingphelps
everlastingphelps topcommenter

zzzzzzz


Also, apparently the DO thinks that you can't have a minority or poverty view without shoving a big blatant piece of explicit promiscuity into it. That says more about the DO than it does minorities or the poor.

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

I think that you are confusing "banned" with "removed from a required reading list".


The books in question are still available from the HPISD library.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@TheRuddSki ... as you've banned intelligent thought from what pretends to be your brain.

bmarvel
bmarvel topcommenter

@roo_ster Any taxpayer, rooster? Trouble is, it's not parents of the kids in the classroom who are getting the books banned. It's a couple church ladies.

observist
observist topcommenter

@roo_ster Private schools!  That's the answer to hysterical prudery!

taxpayer
taxpayer

@sherismith i have heard complaints since 2005, and getting louder every year 2010-2014.   i have a graduate.  this isn't new. 


dingo
dingo

@sherismith 

' 99% of HP is against the ban'

And 99% of the posters on this blog seem to have ignored that or any other fact that would threaten their opportunity for misdirected derisive gloating.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@TheRuddSki 

I think they just took a scissor and cut out the words that were deemed to be inappropriate.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@everlastingphelps

Right, because we all know that in the real "minority or poverty" world, just like in the Park Cities, there is no promiscuity. Doesn't exist. None of it actually, so why would it be mentioned in any literary works?

After all they shouldn't ever, ever read about it, that way they will not know about it, right?

Too funny....

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@TPFKAP

You are correct, the books have not been removed from the shelves in the school library.

They have been "banned" from any course or class discussion, so they have been banned from the classroom.

While it is positive for parents to be interested and involved in the child's school, the parents concerns are over the top as it relates to these books.

The books are highly regarded works of both fiction and non-fiction, many have been given literary awards.

roo_ster
roo_ster

@bmarvel @roo_ster 

Absofreakinglutely.

Those who pay the taxes have the moral right to influence how they are spent.  Doesn't matter if they are church ladies, soccer moms, or whomever.

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@mavdog

Yeah, like "ban" and "illegal".

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@bvckvs @ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul 

The books were not just removed from the reading lists - they were also removed from the shelves and they're not allowed back.

That is not accurate. the books were removed  ("banned") from course instruction. from the DMN article:

"Superintendent Dawson Orr suspended the books from high school instruction last week after parents contacted district officials and circulated emails with excerpts of sex scenes and references to mature themes, such as rape, abuse and abortion. The books cannot be taught, pending a review by a committee of teachers, parents and students. The books are still available in the school’s library."

RTGolden1
RTGolden1 topcommenter

@mavdog I'm strongly against any kind of ban, prohibition or even old-lady hen-clucking over books, no matter the genre, subject matter or content.  Arrange the lists and make available to kids age-appropriate reading material that they can understand and then encourage them to read.

However, literary awards would be the last, absolute last, criteria I would use to categorize books.  Recognition by some committee somewhere is not at all indicative of whether or not the content appeals to kids of various age groups, whether the writing is comprehensible to children.  And if it doesn't fit those two criteria, no amount of lauding and praising the book or the author is going to get kids to read it.

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@mavdog

They have been "banned" from any course or class discussion...

Cite?

abbywarren
abbywarren

@roo_ster @bmarvel The thing is is that if a parent does not deem it fit for their child to read a specific book then they may send in a form and request that they have an alternate reading assignment, the fact that petty parents are banning books from the entire high school to enjoy is absolutely absurd considering most of the 'taxpayers' are strongly against the absurd banning of these books.

bmarvel
bmarvel topcommenter

@roo_ster @bmarvel So your theory, roo, is the most votes would go to whoever pays the most taxes.  Of course nobody in Highland Park actually got to vote on the book ban, did they?

Jezzerat
Jezzerat

@roo_ster @bmarvel Oh, horsecrap.  Your "moral right" extends to you and yours, and no further.  They should be leaving it up to the parents individually, not banning them outright.

sherismith
sherismith

@bvckvs @dingo @sherismith

the 2 moms leading this live in HP but dont have kids in school there. their group of 2 makes them less than 1% of HP population.  

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@TheRuddSki 

they clearly see the word "ban" as not only appropriate but useful.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@RTGolden1

it all depends on who is bestowing the award wouldn't you think? and for what genre/recognition it is given...

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul 

as I said, you're correct, but they have been pulled from the classroom and are not being taught/discussed by the teachers and students. the student can now check them out of the library and read them on their own.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@TheRuddSki 

read the linked article from DMN, and the additional articles.

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@mavdog

I must have missed the part about banning discussion.

Or, maybe it's just not there.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@TheRuddSki 

"Highland Park ISD suspended seven books from classroom use"

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@mavdog

Oh. I thought books and discussions were different things.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@TheRuddSki 

hmm, a lit/english course on books without any discussion of the books. that would be...odd to say the least.

how long has it been since you took a lit class? or did you not take lit/english?

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@mavdog

You're trying too hard.

bmarvel
bmarvel topcommenter

@TheRuddSki Little hard to discuss a book in class, Ruddski, if students haven't read it. But, then, look how many commenters here are discussing these books without having read them.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...