Is it possible to obtain/purchase copies of this research?
Thanks
Is it possible to obtain/purchase copies of this research?
Thanks
2. Louis W Powers said on Feb. 28, 2013
For the wells completed todate can you tell me what their average ultimate reserves will be. Same question for the Wells to be drilled in the future. For the Wells currently Producing what was their total cost to develop per well average. For the future wells what was their total per well average cost. I assume you used some type of price escalation for gas and operating costs. What were they. Thanks
Lou Powers
3. Michael Williams said on Feb. 28, 2013
How can one get a copy of the report.
With best regards,
Michael Williams
4. Ron Wagner said on Feb. 28, 2013
Natural gas is the future of energy. It is replacing dirty old coal plants, and dangerous expensive nuclear plants. It will fuel cars, trucks, vans, buses, locomotives, aircraft, ships, tractors, engines of all kinds. It costs far less. It will help keep us out of more useless wars, where we shed our blood and money. It is used to make many products. It will bring jobs and boost our economy. It lowers CO2 emissions, and pollution. Over 5,200 select natural gas story links on my free blog. An annotated and illustrated bibliography of live links, updated daily. The worldwide picture of natural gas. Read in 75 nations. ronwagnersrants . blogspot . com
5. Loriano Bocini said on March 1, 2013
I would like to know whether a study on proppants to be used in shale gas has been carried on, in particular on advantages that quality proppants may have.
Thank you
6. Bob Linden said on March 1, 2013
Could you share your gas price assumptions behind this production forecast? I expect the production curve would have very different shapes and cumulative values under different price scenarios.
7. Tony Imhof said on March 1, 2013
Of course it is all about the decline rate. In trying to estimate from your 'Production Outlook' graph it appears that the decline of any given years first to second year's production looks in the order of 33 %. Isn't the published decline rate more in the 60 to 70 % range?
8. yt75 said on March 1, 2013
A bit of fresh air (scientific honesty), in the current hysteric propaganda, thanks for that
9. ek said on March 1, 2013
Is the study public information?
10. Jay Pollard said on March 2, 2013
How can I obtain a copy of the full report and study?
11. Clifford Gaddy said on March 3, 2013
What is the title of the actual report, and how does one obtain a copy?
12. Vince Matthews said on March 3, 2013
In ten years (2000-2010), 15,000 wells increased production in the Barnett to 1.9 TCF. If no further wells are drilled, the model predicts a drop in production over the next ten years (2010-2020) of about 1.5 TCF. With the drilling of 13,000 additional wells, Barnett production will still drop 0.3 TCF by 2020.
These data and the BEG model should give this country pause in putting all of our energy eggs into the shale-gas basket.
13. Steve Evanchik said on March 4, 2013
Does the report address the possibility of drilling new wells between wells that are existing?
To clarify, was the spacing between wells (which were drilled in 2008 appropriate, for given 5 more years of experience would there be an opportunity to drill between these wells and or at different elevations within the shale?
Existing wells were described as ELEPHANTS in the Barnett shale.
14. Chris Neil said on March 4, 2013
Is it possible to get on an email list to receive future announcements of your work in this area?
The Marcellus study sounds very interesting because of the possible size of the area. Several aspects of the Marcellus seem less defined that the Barnett, Haynesville or Fayetteville.
Is there a chance that you will be able to extend your work to tight oil formations?
15. Stan Scobie said on March 5, 2013
A number of news outlets are reporting on this study, including a fairly extensive report in the Wall Street Journal.
However, the study itself is apparently not available; this was confirmed bt the WSJ reporter, Mr. Gold.
I am at a complete loss to understand how the University could be promulgating the results of an unavailable work in the full knowledge that news media would be taking the offered results and conclusions based on a summary with no possibility of confirmation.
Could you please comment?
Thank you.
Stanley R. Scobie, Senior Fellow, PSE Healthy Energy;
http://www.psehealthyenergy.org/;
Binghamton, NY
16. Ryan said on March 10, 2013
Is this study available? I still can't find it anywhere, I'd love to read it.
1. Peter Chipman said on Feb. 28, 2013