NY Votes to Ban Fracking for Two years

http://www.pdamerica.org/news/item/1432-new-york-assembly-votes-to-ban-hydrofracking-for-two-years

Click the link above for the article! That is pretty sweet! I guess permits were not even being issued but now they won’t until at least May 2015. They are also adding more public health reviews and ways for community members to express their concerns and opinions. Think that is very reasonable. People just want to make sure it is safe before they allow NY to become a major fracking site. Why is that just so infuriating to many politicians? It can’t just be about the money, right? The vote was 103-40 so you gotta believe a few Republicans voted aye? And some Dems voted nay? But what an overwhelming majority to ban! That surprises me actually! GO NY!

Between the Bedrock and a Hard Place

Obama is going to make millions of people mad no matter what he does. Check out a new article by Kevin Begos, Associated Press that was posted Saturday, November 17th.  Gas drilling presents Obama with historic choices.

If Obama goes full force with Oil & Gas companies and fully endorses fracking he will make some enemies in the environmental world. Just based on personal opinion, it seems that most people who advocate for the environment tend to be more liberal. This can be bad for Obama and the democrats in general. However, if Obama goes full force and requires much more research on fracking or bans fracking he is going to make enemies as well. Anyone that sees job creation as priority in this country will criticize his decision. Anyone that believes fracking is completely safe and believes all the health and environmental issues are inaccurate will criticize his decision. Either way someone loses, someone “wins” I guess. He just has to decide who deserves to win more.

However, job creation can take place even if a ban on fracking was enacted. Obama wants to put more money into “green” jobs. He could become an advocate for alternative energies and boost the jobs in those fields. Jobs can be created in wind, solar and geothermal energies. Scientists could start researching greener methods of energy, ways to produce energy and how to reduce costs. Look at all those jobs. There will be a lot of upfront costs when investing in these alternative energies more. However, in the long run it will benefit our country, our environment and our economy. It’s just like prevention costs. Yes it costs more to try and prevent problems AT FIRST but will save money in the long run. Isn’t everyone’s goal to create a greener future? For our future generations?

So what if there was a ban on fracking. Well the Oil & Gas company executives would be just fine for awhile. Perhaps all the “little people” who would lose jobs could instead be put to work on these alternative energy projects? Perhaps if both sides collaborated something could be worked out. But let’s face it that wouldn’t happen. The Oil & Gas companies would criticize Obama for causing thousands to lose their jobs. I wish there was a way we could all understand each other! However, if people are suffering in a community that doesn’t affect your life, it’s much harder to have empathy or even believe what’s happening. Apparently documentaries don’t help because many call Gasland a farce, just a way for Josh Fox to make money. Many say that all of those bad things that happened in the documentary can be explained by other things. Guess that is a way for people to sleep at night.

Isn’t this the same as saying smoking doesn’t cause lung cancer? Yes a lot of people smoke and never get lung cancer. A lot of people get lung cancer and don’t smoke. But does that mean we should never talk about the lung cancer-smoking link? Okay so fracking may not have caused all those health problems, the environmental problems, the crop issues, the animal deaths, etc. A lot of things can cause these. But should we ignore the facts that many people have had problems only after fracking began and only after wells appeared on their property? That’s just lazy. Sure, get people to sign massively long, confusing documents to absolve your company of any wrong doing. Even to sign up for a sweepstakes there are 10 page documents you have to agree to. It’s seems as if everyone is constantly trying to cover their own butt and not worry about any negative effects that has. How do we change that? In a culture where anyone can get sued for anything, how do we combat that? How can we fight for the true victims in all of this? It’s easy to not care about fracking if it’s not happening where you live. It’s very easy… but is it right? You can’t blame people for being upset with the Oil & Gas companies who make exorbitant amounts of money from fracking, seem to have no interest in making it right for those who have suffered and are even starting to consider exporting it to other parts of the world!

DISCLAIMER: This blog post represents the opinion of the author- Pheasant Weber. This is not necessarily the view of all the bloggers or my classmates working on this task force. THANKS for reading this blog this Fall 2012 semester.

FRACKING Panel Event

FRACKING PANEL
Date: Thursday, November 29th

Time: 11 am to 12:30 pm

Location: University of Illinois at Chicago’s Richard J. Daley Library

801 S. Morgan Street

Chicago IL 60607

Daley Room – # 1-470 (1st floor)

Thank you to Taylor for creating the brochure! Check it out! Fracking Brochure

Contamination, Corruption and Cancer without Consent

Contamination, corruption and cancer without consent by Dina Elmuti

Thank you to Dina Elmuti for writing this Op-Ed. Please click this link to download it: POLICY – OP-ED

“You have cancer.” It’s probably one of the most devastating, mind-numbing things one could ever hear. I wouldn’t wish the pain, uncertainty, or feelings of frustration and fear on anyone, not even the corrupt forces that inadvertently bring it to communities through endeavors like hydraulic fracturing engineered by corporate greed and vested interests at the expense of people’s lives and health. Such a practice is aggressive and opportunistic as the cancers and diseases it produces. High volume hydraulic fracturing evokes inflammatory discourse and uncompromising stances by both its advocates and opponents alike and science and politics are formidable forces shaping the every move of its progress.

A few months ago, I had only heard of the phrase hydraulic fracturing and quite ignorantly never gave it much thought.  Growing up in central Illinois, I never realized how close to home it hit. Colloquially known as “fracking,” the process is as abrasive and innately destructive as it sounds. A clandestine operation, fracking is as murky, toxic, and transparent as the fluid pumped into the wells it uses and the water it contaminates in the process. After reading about the cumulative adverse and chronic health issues concerning this process, I can’t help but feel infuriated. As a cancer survivor, how could I not? As a social work student, how could I remain neutral when it comes to this toxic load of corruption and virulent, insatiable exploitation of others for profit?

Over the past semester, my graduate level policy class formed a Task Force on Hydraulic Fracturing to address the public health, environmental, political, and social justice implications of hydraulic fracturing.  What we learned was shocking, upsetting, and enough to make us take action. The carcinogenic and environmental toxins, in addition to contaminants brought to the surface in wastewater through this process, can potentially lead to irreversible damage, disease, and even death.

Perhaps as you read this you’re thinking, “Why should I care? It doesn’t affect me.”  At one point in time, I would have thought the same but the very thought of ignoring something this toxic is enough to make me shudder now. While fracking may not affect you directly now because you don’t happen to see it taking place in your own backyard or your faucet hasn’t caught on fire, perhaps it’s only a matter of time.

Profiteering drillers have latched onto opportunities to drill for shale gas, and in the process disease clusters are beginning to pop up quicker than pipelines and wellheads. While the rich and powerful oil and gas companies rush to drill for their benefit, the lives of people from tight-knit industrialized communities are fractured as they pay the ultimate price with their health. And while the head honchos of profit-seeking corporations call the shots and conveniently slip through loopholes designed to absolve them of responsibility, it’s oftentimes those of lower socioeconomic status and vulnerable populations who bear a disproportionate burden of negative environmental consequences and end up with the greatest burden of illness.

It’s these hard-working people who have become victims of predatory mineral leases and essentially have no say in what goes on in their own backyards and ultimately their own health. People are rarely if ever informed of the very serious health implications of hydraulic fracturing because of secrecy and bureaucratic games played. Hydraulic fracturing not only turns the earth inside out; it does the same thing to the lives of people who are impacted by its toxic effects.

Fracking is a malignant force that destroys, damages, discards, and disparages the human rights of people who are exposed to its toxic effects.  It pollutes and poisons their basic human right to clean drinking water, replacing it instead with incendiary faucets of flame and contamination, destroying communities, homes, and ecosystems in the process all in the name of extracting a profit for the benefit of a tiny minority and offsetting the disastrous costs onto the rest of society.

When one learns about the deleterious effects of fracking, reads the shocking testimonials and research concerning the violation of medical ethics and human rights, and meets those who are suffering from excruciating pain from the effects of this process, one cannot simply unlearn it and pretend as though the injustice does not exist.  Remaining quiet is no longer an option. In fact, remaining quiet becomes a complacent political act making us accountable. One need not be the victim of injustice to recognize it and do something to bring about change. One doesn’t not to be an activist, a social worker,  student, professor, alarmist, Democrat, Liberal, environmentalist or hold any other title to care about something as precious as health. It’s something we oftentimes take for granted until it’s gone, but when it comes to fracking we can take a stand now. It’s clear that the only ethical choice is the one that supports social justice and the fundamental human right to health. So long as people of conscience remain neutral or stay quiet, practices like hydraulic fracturing will continue metastasizing calamitous consequences, greed and illness – one well at a time with complete impunity.

Sometimes in life we’re tested by adversity, whether that’s illness or social injustice. And sometimes we’re given the opportunity to do something to cause a chain of positive action creating a catalyst that sparks amazing results. As people of conscience, I think we can do that by taking a first step against the insidious practice of fracking. If you’re interested in learning more about fracking, please join us at our panel discussion at the Daley Library on November 29th from 11-12:30.

¿Fracturamiento hidráulico, que es? ¿Y por que me debe importar?

¿Fracturamiento hidráulico, que es? ¿Y por que me debe importar?

fracturamientohidraulico

Click the above link to download this Opinion Editorial by Alitze Nevarez.

Alitze Nevarez

La técnica del fracturamiento hidráulico es un método que la industria petrolera y gasífera usa para extraer petróleo crudo, o gas natural de formaciones geológicasen el subsuelo.  Las formaciones geológicas cuales están siendo fracturadas, se encuentran de 5,000 a 9,000 pies bajo tierra. El fracturamiento hidráulico consiste de el rompimiento o fractura de formaciones geológicas mediante inyección de un fluido a una alta tasa o presión.  El objeto de el fracturamiento hidráulico es causar canales de flujo (fracturas), para luego incrementar la conductividad de la formación y por ende el flujo de fluidos hacia el pozo.  La continua inyección del fluido fracturante permite ampliar y extender la fractura, y así aumentar el gas o petróleo colectado.

El fluido usado para fracturar consiste principalmente de 2 a 10 millones de galones de agua, mezclada con químicos y sólidos, como la arena. Los químicos usados para creer este fluido suelen ser tóxicos. Científicos estudiando los efectos del fracturamiento hidráulico en la salud humana han encontrado hidrocarburos potencialmente tóxicos en el aire cercano a los pozos donde se practica la técnica.  Estos químicos incluyen el benceno y xileno. Efectos del benceno en la salud, en grandes cantidades, incluye letargo, mareo, aceleración del latido del corazón, dolor de cabeza, temblores, confusión y pérdida del conocimiento. La exposición prolongada al benceno puede producir alteraciones en la sangre, y puede producir cáncer en la medula osea. También han encontrado que la agua cerca de estos pozos puede contaminar fuentes de agua natural cerca al área.

La calidad del aire es motivo de preocupación ya que los pozos siendo creados por la industria petrolera y gasífera son creados cerca de zonas residenciales.  Personas pueden inhalar químicos e emisiones toxicas creadas por el fracturamiento hidráulico de un pozo, o emisiones accidentales del gas natural siendo extraído.  Motivo de preocupación es también lo que la demanda que la industria petrolera y gasífera le esta poniendo a fuentes de agua natural, y el potencial de contaminación de agua debido a la practica del fracturamiento hidráulico.

Aun mas preocupante es el hecho que en el sur de Illinois, la industria petrolera y gasífera ya empezó negociaciones con el gobierno de Illinois para permitir el fracturamiento hidráulico en esta zona. La formación geológica la cual quieren fracturar se llama The New Albany Shale.  Investigaciones acerca de los efectos del fracturamiento hidráulico han concluido que esta practica tiene cientos de químicos tóxicos que penetran el agua, el aire, y el suelo de las áreas donde esta practica ocurre. Mas importante aun, es el gran efecto negativo que estas practicas tienen en la salud de los humanos, de los animales, y en la agricultura.

Motivo de frustración es el hecho que el gobierno de Illinois no ha hecho nada para poner un alto a esta practica. Actualmente la organización, Southern Illinoisans Against Fracturing Our Environment esta colectando firmas para imponer una moratoria de dos años en el fracturamiento hidráulico.  Esta moratoria seria para que el gobierno y la industria haga una investigación para encontrar mejores métodos de extraer petróleo o gas natural de los pozos, específicamente en Illinois.

Es importante informarse acerca de la practicas del gobierno y de la industria petrolera y gasífera, especialmente si estas practicas tienen efectos tan serios/negativos en la población general.

Email si tienen mas preguntas

http://www.slideshare.net/gabosocorro/presentacin-fracturamiento-hidraulico

http://www.scribd.com/doc/31552905/fracturamiento-hidraulic

http://www.tendencias21.net/El-fracturamiento-hidraulico-en-los-pozos-de-gas-es-nocivo-para-la-salud-humana_a10755.html

http://www.tendencias21.net/El-fracturamiento-hidraulico-en-los-pozos-de-gas-es-nocivo-para-la-salud-humana_a10755.html

http://www.slideshare.net/gabosocorro/fracturamiento-hidraulico-tema-5