Texas Could Bring In $166 Million from Legalizing Marijuana, Man

Categories: Drugs

PotSmokingStudents.jpg
Sroalf
A Texas pep rally, after $166 million in cannabis cash goes to the TEA.

Good news for E. Cannabis Unum supporters across the country: Texas, land of big businesses and economic prosperity, could stand to gain a ton of money from legalizing marijuana -- more than $166 million per year, by some estimates. That's a Texas Miracle if we've ever heard one.

Of course, it would also take a miracle.

A report out this week by financial analysts at NerdWallet points to the financial benefits of legalizing marijuana. "We put the study out there because with the upcoming election, citizens will cast ballots for recreational and medical marijuana," says Divya Raghavan, who authored the study. "People have to make this decision very quickly." Voters in Oregon, Alaska, Washington, D.C., Florida and California will consider various levels of marijuana decriminalization this November.

So where does that number come from? Because all marijuana sales in this state are under-the-table, it's difficult to get an exact number. But a solid estimate of Texas' marijuana market can be built based on the approximate population of pot smokers and the states' percentage of the U.S. marijuana market. From there, Texas' sales tax and an expected sin tax yield an annual estimated revenue of $166,303,963.

Although we're not optimistic that pot will make it to the Texas ballot anytime soon, that would be a helluva boost for the state economy. "Everyone knows that it leads to increased revenue, but we wanted to put a number to that," Raghavan says. "And these are conservative numbers. They don't include reduced spending on law enforcement, which is around 7.7 billion nationwide. And we also didn't include potential market changes. It's possible, if it's legalized, use would increase."

And the revenue would likely go to a worthy cause. "States would have to decide how exactly would they want to spend this increased revenue," says Raghavan. "Washington, for example, intends to put that revenue toward education and drug rehabilitation programs." Can we just say right now how much we love the idea of a pot-funded Texas Education Agency?

Any predicted costs from legalizing marijuana would likely come from regulatory adjustments. "There would definitely be increased spending on regulating the marijuana legal market," Raghavan says. "There would be a lot of work that would have to go into this. Do they want to legalize edibles? What kind of FDA restrictions do they want to impose? Where will they put the revenue?"

Still, the financial benefits far outweigh any drawbacks. For some perspective, Raghavan points out, marijuana legalization would likely bring in more money than University of Texas football, the most valuable college team in the country. "Texas stands to gain a lot," she says. "There's the percentage of people in the state that smoke marijuana, and then there's the size of the state. For Texas, any major change like this would have a giant impact on the state's revenue."

My Voice Nation Help
109 comments
kduble
kduble

If promoters are smart, they'll get Republicans to sponsor a legalization bill with an excise tax on pot to offset a cut in the ad valorem tax. Try getting Republicans to vote against that!

fordamist
fordamist

In the early 70's it was 'liquor by the drink.'  You couldn't go into a bar and buy one,  you had to join a 'private club.' Shiite Babtists raised Holy Hell when changes were suggested,  Poor Little Johnny will starve 'cause Daddy (never Mama) is drinking up his lunch money.

State taxes increased by a bundle.   But,  it took a couple decades.

We should be thankful,  the only Guv we have (right now) has said it's gonna happen,  he's kinda halfway in favor of it.

I asked my MD how long before he'd be able to prescribe it medically.  "This being Texas,  a LONG time!"

Mervis
Mervis

Monkeys Could Fly Out Of My Butt, Man


Oh, I thought it was "Write Crazy Shit Day".

headlessprettyboy
headlessprettyboy

Remember when we were promised that if we legalized the lottery in Texas (I know some of you aren't old enough to remember pre-"gambling" days), that it would bring in so much money for education that all of our school funding problems would go away?


Yeah, I'm pretty skeptical about this promise, too.

rubbbrduky
rubbbrduky

So here is my question, if this shit was legalized how would employers go about drug test for new hires as well as people who would come to work legally high and fuck up on their job because of being high, which we all know could happen. I tried weed back in the late 80's and it's not for me personally. Let's look at the recent shit of happenings in Colorado as an example. But I will say people that are high are easier targets on the street for mugging and beat downs, so maybe it's not such a bad idea. Just sayin'

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

Colorado didn't legalize marijuana, they COMMERCIALIZED it while maintaining CRIMINAL Prohibition -- not a single Felony statute against marijuana was repealed, not a single Misdemeanor statute against marijuana was repealed.


Colorado even recently INCREASED some marijuana criminal penalties to Class 1 -- the same as Rape and Homicide -- punishable by 32 years in prison.


Colorado was LIED TO by the Pro Pot Pimps as to how much revenue marijuana would generate, and their wildly inflated tax fantasies are so disappointing that politicians and citizens are grumbling about needing to raise the tax rates and to further restrict and eliminate -- criminalize -- the ability of individual patients / caregivers / users to legally grow their own sustainable supplies.


Colorado marijuana sales taxes don't even reach 1/2 of 1% of overall sales tax revenues. The liars behind Amendment 64 promised the State a minimum of $40 million per year for School construction via a special pot excise tax. Current collections place that tax to only make  $12 million -- not enough to build a single school.


It's a LIE to claim that Colorado legalized marijuana. It's foolish to believe that lie.


everlastingphelps
everlastingphelps topcommenter

As someone who is 100% for legalization (not just decriminalization), take these numbers with a grain of salt.  First, the black market won't go away.  Alcohol is legal and taxed, but there are still bootleggers and moonshiners.  That's what has happened in Colorado, and if we sell this as a revenue solution rather than a freedom solution, we are setting ourselves up for re-regulation pretty quickly.  (See: Red light cameras.)


When it's a revenue issue, .gov has an incentive to set the tax too high, which just continues the black market.  Our goal should really be to get the market into the open (even if that means lower taxes and less revenue) and run the black market out of business.  If it's really about revenue, jack the taxes up once the (illegal) drug cartels are broken.


You want to start that ball rolling?  Take the jurisdiction away from the FDA, and give it to the USDA, where it belongs.  (Marijuana is a weed, not a drug.  Coffee is as much a drug as marijuana.)

Montemalone
Montemalone topcommenter

Rather than make promises of increased tax collections, better to note the huge decrease in tax expenditure if weed were legal.

Police, SWAT, Lawyers, Courts, Jails, and all the other prison-industrial complex participants would no longer be feeding at the publicly funded trough. All those current tax dollars wasted on chasing Cheech and Chong could be used for pie in the sky dreams like roads (the non-tolled variety) and maintenance and libraries and schools and traffic signals and streetcars and maybe even a few drug treatment centers for the true addicts.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

To a clueless stoner, $166 million sounds like a big number, to the State of Texas with an annual budget of $92 BILLION! ... the pathetic pot revenue is barely 1/10th of 1% of the operating expenses, and not worth the hassle of the invading Greedy Big $$ Dispensary Cartels and the Cannabis Clown Circus that accompanies them.


It'd be wiser to DE-criminalize marijuana first before rushing in to commercialize it.




Voot
Voot

What are government sin taxes going for per unit these days?

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

Goodbye Eric Holder. Moment of silence please.

ScottsMerkin
ScottsMerkin topcommenter

@rubbbrduky Well its still not ok to come to work drunk, and some places ban smoking, and sometimes cigarette smokers all together, so they still have the choice to not hire weed smokers.  You see, weed smoking is a choice, therefore none of your rights as a human are being violated.  You can choose to smoke, you cant choose to be white, black, asian, etc.

tgtg999
tgtg999

@rubbbrduky  And like wow man...what if people came to work drunk...like wow man...and fell down on the job...and all of that stuff...and also man like the lotto money is being scammed by Prick Perry...wow, I think I can fly...no its just my liver failure again from drinking so much liquor then driving....

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@rubbbrduky ... the prohibitionists who wrote Colorado's phony "legalization" amendment -- and the precedent medical amendment --explicitly granted Employers, Insurers and the Government the power to continue to discriminate against all marijuana users, whether medical or recreational.


Colorado's amendment was so biased toward maintaining criminal prohibition and police / government power and control that it failed to establish what most constitutional amendments set out to do -- it failed to create a Personal Right to use marijuana.


Colorado's idiotic amendment explicitly declared that "Driving under the INFLUENCE of Marijuana shall REMAIN ILLEGAL' without defining that or setting any objective scientific standards, which left the interpretation and standard setting up to the prohibitionist politicians who set the limit so low -- 5ng/ml -- that almost every regular patient/user would always be in violation if they ever drove a vehicle.


Not surprising that NORML supported this absurdity, being that NORML is the lobbying arm of the Marijuana McShyster Lawyers who will reap windfalls of $$ from every new DUI-marijuana fool who gets arrested.



NightSand
NightSand

@everlastingphelps as I understand it; Colorado didn't enable growers to be able to keep up with the demand, so the prices are being driven up, hence the black market still being there.  I would hope Texas, since it doesn't have a medical program, would just regulate it like alcohol and be able to produce large amounts and tax all people purchasing it.   I would imagine this would keep the market stable and eliminate the black market.  I would guess there are a lot more taxes than 166 mil for Texas if they legalized it.   

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@everlastingphelps " if we sell this as a revenue solution rather than a freedom solution, we are setting ourselves up for re-regulation pretty quickly. "


Exactly!


It's a LIE to claim the Colorado "legalized" marijuana -- they COMMERCIALIZED it, while maintaining FELONY CRIMINAL PROHIBITIONS against private individuals who'd dare compete with their greedy revenue generation schemes or interfere with the profits of the Greedy Big $$ Dispensary Cartels that have overrun the state.


If it's about FREEDOM, then DE-Criminalize it completely, remove ALL Felonies and Misdemeanor statutes from the books.


If it's about Government Controlled COMMERCIALIZATION ... go fuck yourselves.




RTGolden1
RTGolden1 topcommenter

@Montemalone You want them to do something useful and beneficial with that money?  Graft and greed have such a hollow ring when they produce anything other than scandal.

NightSand
NightSand

@DonkeyHotay well its two fold right?  166 mil of revenue that was otherwise not there (I guessing it would be a lot more), plus the taxes from the new businesses, employees, etc.  In addition savings on the Justice System would probably be more.  So yes Texas has a large budget, but saving a bunch of money and added a bunch of money would probably be a good thing, right?  

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@Voot


Legalize and Tax ALL Drugs, Prostitution and Gambling! ... imagine the revenue $$$ it would bring!



DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@bvckvs "simple-minded people" ... the target demographic for "playing" the Lottery.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@bvckvs ... Little People of Little Minds beg for Little Freedoms.


NewsFlash -- in Colorado, PRIOR to the fake "legalization" amendment, under State law, ANYONE of ANY AGE could use or possess up to 2 (two) ounces of pot and not go to jail -- it was only a $100 petty offense fine *if* caught. That law had been on the books for DECADES.


The bullshit "legalization" Amendment 64 only allows 1 (one) pathetic ounce, and EXCLUDES everyone -- ADULTS included -- under 21 years old from any legal access.


Does it hurt to be so ignorant?

everlastingphelps
everlastingphelps topcommenter

@NightSand @everlastingphelps The black market in CO is competing on price.  The price for legal weed is at the high end of street price, according to the articles I've read.  CO's tax rate on it is only about 15%, which should eventually be low enough to drive the black market out.  (Unlike NYC's 100% cigarette tax rate, which has a thriving black market.)

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@NightSand "166 mil of revenue that was otherwise not there"


Same could be said of legalizing ALL drugs, prostitution and gambling ... if you blindly ignore the direct and indirect social costs.


@NightSand " In addition savings on the Justice System would probably be more."


That would only happen if it were ACTUALLY LEGALIZED -- i.e. ALL Criminal Statutes against marijuana repealed. 


No state has done this. Colorado did NOT repeal a single Felony marijuana statute. 


Colorado did NOT repeal a single Misdemeanor marijuana statute. 


Colorado ONLY eliminated a petty offense $100 / fine for simple possession of 1 pathetic ounce or less. 


Private sales between consenting adults are still illegal -- a FELONY for even a single joint.


ALL Adults under 21 were completely EXCLUDED from any legal access to rec. marijuana, not a single gram are they allowed.


Growing 7 plants -- or even sprouting 7 seeds or rooting 7 clones is still a FELONY.


The Dept. of Revenue created 1000s of pages of new Regulations, Rules and Laws regarding marijuana.


Colorado's A64 mandates that DUI-marijuana shall REMAIN ILLEGAL, and foolishly allowed the prohibitionist legislature to set the standard of 5ng/ml -- so low that nearly every regular user / patient would always exceed this level whenever they drive a vehicle, guaranteeing 1000s of fools will be sucked into the vortex of the Court System and the for-profit drug "rehab" industry.


The Legislature just last year INCREASED one of the penalties for Marijuana to a Class 1 Felony -- equivalent to Rape and Homicide, with a 32 year prison sentence!


The Prohibitionist Law Enforcers and the Justice System in Colorado haven't missed a beat, in spite of the BLATANTLY FALSE Headlines that lazy incompetent media spew about Colorado "Legalizing" pot.


hth



TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@dingo

...the Justice Department must finally cough up documents about how Holder’s Justice Department lied to Congress and the American people...

You can hear the hard drives crashing in the distance.

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@Sotiredofitall

Few can top Janet, but Eric was wonderfully protective of federal malfeasance, and of course his "people".

Another former radical nutter gone.

RTGolden1
RTGolden1 topcommenter

@DonkeyHotay @ScottsMerkin It is a choice and a right to possess a firearm.  Marijuana should have gotten the same treatment. If an establishment, employer or government entity decides to not allow that possession on their property, they are not violating that right.

If I follow your comments here correctly, you and I are on the same page with Colorado's botched 'legalization' of marijuana.  I don't see the DUI-marijuana element as a mistake in and of itself, but the setting of the limit so low is idiotic.  And the penalties defy any sense of reason and decency.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@everlastingphelps ... the "black market" for pot -- the same Friends, Family and Associates that stoners have always scored their weed from -- will ALWAYS exist, and will ALWAYS be able to out-compete the over-regulated, overtaxed, greedy big $$ dispensary cartels.


Retail Dispensaries are for Tourists, Newbies and Suckers who don't have any private connections.


In the U$A, the "black markets" for Alcohol and Tobacco are BILLIONS! of $$$ every year ... each!


And Tobacco is only worth $2.00 /lb wholesale ... or less than 1/1000th of the wholesale pot market in Colorado.


Until marijuana gets down to $2.00 / POUND, and only suffers normal sales taxes -- FULL LEGALIZATION / DECRIMINALIZATION -- there will always be a thriving "black market".


Now ask yourself, what's the size of the "black market" for tomatoes or oregano?






mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@TheRuddSki 

John Mitchell tops them all as the worst.

Ed Meese and Alberto Gonzales surely are higher on the list.

Don't forget Harry Daugherty

Sotiredofitall
Sotiredofitall topcommenter

@Myrna.Minkoff-Katz 


But it’s not just right-wingers who are up in arms over Holder. Apart from his casual approach to civil liberties and the First Amendment, folks on the left are livid that the attorney general can find no one on Wall Street to perp-walk directly from the corner offices of JPMorgan into federal prison. Progressive senators such as Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) are asking the DOJ exactly when “too big to fail” morphed into “too big to jail.” "

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@bvckvs It's actually very pig-ignorant of you to deny the reality of the primary demographic of lottery "players".



DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@RTGolden1 "If an establishment, employer or government entity decides to not allow that possession on their property, they are not violating that right."


Doesn't Texas law allow gun nuts the right to carry on OTHER PEOPLE's property -- businesses -- even if the business owner doesn't want it?



TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@mavdog

Holder learned from Mitchell just like Obama learned from Nixon.

ScottsMerkin
ScottsMerkin topcommenter

@Sotiredofitall @Myrna.Minkoff-Katz JPMorgan pays over $25 Billion in fines to the government, and somehow Jamie Dimon is not only not in jail, but still runs the fucking company.  Splain that shit

RTGolden1
RTGolden1 topcommenter

@DonkeyHotay No, they don't.  If the property owner or establishment posts something to the effect of "no firearms allowed", it will be treated as trespassing.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@TheRuddSki 

if you mean they learned how not to be criminals and violate the law like Mitchell and Nixon, yes you are right.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@bvckvs <== one of the clueless fools who thinks "playing" the lottery is a way to "get money".


LOL!

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@RTGolden1 ... so what was all that idiocy of Gun Loons carrying their rifles into random businesses as protest?



TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

"The poll asked respondents their opinions about 10 different national political officials, ranging from Bill Clinton to President Obama to Eric Holder, as well as the Democratic and Republican parties.

They were given choices of very positive, somewhat positive, neutral, somewhat negative, very negative and “don’t know the name.” About a third of respondents didn’t know who Mr. Holder is (37 percent). However, those Americans who knew Mr. Holder gave him the second-lowest “positive” rating of anyone or any organization on the survey at a mere 15 percent. Only Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio had a lower “positive” rating than Mr. Holder.

The attorney general’s “positive” rating was less than half of the positive rating of the Republican Party and 27 points behind that of his boss, Mr. Obama, who was rated favorably by only 42 percent of respondents."

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/16/fund-von-spakovsky-the-injustice-of-eric-holder/#ixzz3ELzwb0YN

Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@mavdog

Maybe the rogue IRS democrat party operatives have reason to worry now.

RTGolden1
RTGolden1 topcommenter

@DonkeyHotay @RTGolden1 those businesses allowed open carry.  Some still do.  As a result of said Gun Loons, others no longer allow it.

From what I can tell, the objective of the loons was to extend open carry in TX to handguns as well as long guns.  Apparently it is difficult for Arlingtonites to find suitable long gun accessories for their Cubavera shirts, cargo shorts, flip flops and fedoras

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@Sotiredofitall 

Update (3:17 p.m.): Sharpton sent a statement to Business Insider clarifying that he is not involved in the "decision making."

"We did not say we are in the decision making. We are in conversation to reach out to them to have meetings about what we want to see in a successor," said Sharpton. "I have personally spoken to Attorney General Eric Holder today to express my views that he was the best civil rights Attorney General in history."

Al Sharpton engaging in self-promotion, making himself appear to be important.

who would have thought? I mean heck, have we ever seen this from him before?

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@Sotiredofitall

Having read that a semi-literate race hustler is advising the worst president ever, I became encouraged that finally, this Nation of Cowards might just find the courage to laugh their asses off.

What a clown show.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

Around The Web

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...