Skip to main content

Within a few hours of a SCOTUS ruling on a case that essentially gutted Section 5 of the Voter's Rights Act last year, TX Attorney General Greg Abbott immediately enforced one of the most restrictive voter ID laws in the U.S.  This Voter ID law had been previously blocked by a federal court.  

The decision will have immediate practical consequences. Texas announced shortly after the decision that a voter identification law that had been blocked would go into effect immediately, and that redistricting maps there would no longer need federal approval. Changes in voting procedures in the places that had been covered by the law, including ones concerning restrictions on early voting, will now be subject only to after-the-fact litigation.
The Texas Voter ID law makes it difficult for 600,000 citizen who are poor, elderly, homeless, minorities and college students to vote.  Out of state students who attend Texas universities or colleges can no longer use their student IDs to vote.  They have to either bring a U.S. passport (if they have one) or they must drive to a nearby DPS and apply for a state ID.  They will need birth certificates.  Senior citizens who were born at home may not have birth certificates.  Poor folks very likely do not have the money or transportation to obtain a state photo ID.  In less populated areas a DPS could be a long drive from home. And in a state that swears by small government, it means robust services for its residents is lacking.  One can wait three hours in a Houston DPS for a simple driver's license renewal.  

Of course, the groups mentioned above are more likely to vote Democratic.  

The Texas photo ID law is so harsh that lawyers for the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit in a federal court in Corpus Christi.  The case went to trial earlier this fall.  Judge Nelva Gonzalez Ramos recently struck it down with a damning assessment citing the current law as the same as those enacted after the abolishment of slavery.  The kinds of laws that prevented blacks and others from voting.  

"The Court holds that SB 14 creates an unconstitutional burden on the right to vote, has an impermissible discriminatory effect against Hispanics and African-Americans, and was imposed with an unconstitutional discriminatory purpose," Gonzalez Ramos stated in her lengthy ruling issued Thursday. "The Court further holds that SB 14 constitutes an unconstitutional poll tax."
The law is deemed downright un-American by LULAC.
“The history of voter discrimination in Texas is well documented. Literacy tests, poll taxes, redrawing of electoral lines and other mechanisms have been used to intimidate minorities from voting," stated Brent Wilkes, national executive director of the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), which has been fighting voter ID laws. "These efforts are un-American in that they are an assault on the democratic principles upon which this country was founded."
Among those who are hurt the most by the brutal Texas Voter Photo ID Law.

The law would have made it extremely difficult for Texas Latinos such as 18-year-old twins Nicole and Victoria Rodriguez to vote, as groups argued in 2013. The young women at the time did not have driver's licenses since their parents could not afford car insurance, yet they had valid Texas birth certificates, high school IDs and Social Security identification. Still, they would not have been allowed to vote unless they traveled to a state office to get a special photo ID issued by the Department of Public Safety. Voting experts have pointed out the long distances and restricted hours of these state offices, which make obtaining the ID difficult for lower-income residents without cars as well as older voters.
As expected Greg Abbott threw six hundred thousands citizens under the bus and immediately appealed the ruling to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.  His fake rationale is to ensure the integrity of the vote by fighting a non existent epidemic of voter fraud. Everyone except Greg Abbott and his Republican colleagues know voter fraud is non existent.  Voter Fraud?  What Voter Fraud?
In light of the dearth of voter-impersonation problems, it's hard not to conclude that Abbott and his fellow crusaders are being disingenuous - about as disingenuous, the columnist Paul Waldman has noted, as those elected officials claiming that laws mandating restrictions on abortion providers are really just about protecting women's health. What the voting-fraud Elliot Nesses are really concerned about, it seems, is making sure that those who may be inclined to vote other-than-Republican choose not to exercise their right. Apparently, the crusaders want to squeeze down the voting pool to just their most reliable folks.
Despite the fact that there is no voter fraud and everyone knows Greg Abbott's and the Texas GOP true intention is blatantly voter suppression,  the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals blocked Judge Nelva Gonzalez Ramos's ruling from being implemented before Election Day.  

Naturally Greg Abbott and his Republican colleagues are licking their chops and crowing.  Heh, heh.  Those 600,000 "others"  can't vote for Democrats.  Maybe if Republican lawmakers didn't have to lie or deceive voters into voting against their best interests,  or if they had a half way decent message that resonated with middle and low income wage earners they wouldn't have to resort to cheating and suppressing the rights of many of us.  But then it must be hard for a Party that represents the 1% to pretend they care about the rest of us.  Texas is a low voting state and Republicans have been winning with a small minority of voters who are misled by fear mongering.  The Democrats are going to make you have an abortion,  Obama will take away your guns and Obamacare will subject you to death panels.  

But I digress.  What is really disturbing in all of this is the rationale of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals for blocking Judge Ramos's ruling.  Is the court really upholding discrimination and a poll tax?  

How a brutal Texas law got reinstated.

“Essentially, all the marbles of this 5th Circuit order come down to ‘it’s too close to the election to stop the law from going into effect, because pollworkers will be confused,”explains election law expert Justin Levitt of the NYU Brennan Center for Justice.

“It’s important to recognize that the court of appeals did not disturb the district court’s findings that some individuals do not have and will not likely be able to timely get the documents in question,” he adds. The issue is largely, for now, that, given the last minute ruling by the District Court striking down the law, pollworkers may be confused about what the voting requirements actually now are. Some may ask voters for the new restrictive set of Photo ID under the new laws, “preventing some individuals without the narrow set of ID from voting anything other than a provisional ballot,” says Levitt, while others may not.

I am sorry but this does not make any sense.  This year has been the first in which voters have to produce a photo ID in order to vote.  Poll workers are already accustomed to asking for voter cards only with out an additional form of photo ID.  
“So instead, the court makes it legal for all pollworkers to demand the more restricted set (preventing all individuals without the right ID from voting a valid ballot at all),” he continued. “Or, translated even further: if we let the district court’s order stand, some people without the right ID will be able to vote, and some won’t. And if we stay the district court, all people without the right ID won’t be able to vote. And in elections, ‘all’ is better than ‘some.’”

Levitt derides the ruling as “foolish consistency“. “It’s one thing to stop last-minute changes when the impact is less dire for those affected, another to stop last-minute changes when the change is new and unfamiliar, and still another to stop last-minute changes when the reason for the change isn’t clear.”

The “reason” offered by the 5th Circuit is largely more than “The Supreme Court has repeatedly instructed courts to carefully consider the importance of preserving the status quo on the eve an election,” according to the two Republican judges who comprised the majority. The Democratic appointee concurred with the majority, though more narrowly, citing only the SCOTUS precedent for avoiding last minute changes.

In other words the 5th Circuit has enabled Greg Abbott and the Texas Republican Party to disenfranchise 600,000 voters.  And so has the John Robert's Supreme Court.  The Roberts Court is more interested in electing Republicans than they are with justice.  

Which is why elections are so very important.  When we don't vote we end up with hyper conservative judges on the Circuit Courts of Appeals and the SCOTUS who can do us more harm than good.  Reagan, Bush I and Bush II gave us conservative justices that have sided with corporate rights over individual ones.  They gutted the voter's rights act and look what has happened?  600,000 American citizens have been disenfranchised in Texas alone. They ruled money is speech and now the Koch boys and others like them are trying to buy the U.S. Senate.  The Koch's, ALEC and every Texas fat cat already owns the state house. These are only the tips of a very partisan and anti-democratic iceberg, compliments of Republican Presidents.    

Which is one more reason why Texas has to work like hell to flip this state blue.  Once this happens, and it will, eventually, a Republican will not occupy the White House for a very long time.  Given what Republican presidents have done to us since Ronald Reagan is certainly a strong motivating factor for me.  

Texas Democrats, in concert with Battleground TX, have been working for well over a year to flip this state to at least purple.  We now have over 14 million registered voters. This is 800,000 more than we had in 2010.  

Wendy’s team of volunteers has made over 3.9 million phone calls and knocked on over 1.2 million doors, all before the start of GOTV. That’s a lot. That’s the scale of mobilization that can actually change the results of an election.

More voters are registered in Texas than ever before. The 14 million voters represents a 2.8% increase statewide since the last cycle, and per the Houston Chronicle, “voter registration outpaced expected population growth from 2012 to 2014.”

Together, these numbers mean a change in the electorate is afoot. These numbers mean that voters are being asked about issues and informed about the candidates who have never been contacted by either party before. They mean that people who have never voted before have been inspired to register — and which candidate do you think those newly engaged Texans are likely to support? Together, these numbers mean that the

Meanwhile the Houston Chronicle endorses Wendy Davis for Governor.

So, let's get to work everyone.  Vote as if your life depends upon it. Because it does.  Take your family, friends and neighbors to the polls with you.  Sign up to take those without transportation to the the polls.

When Democrats vote.  Democrats win.

Originally posted to Libby Shaw on Sat Oct 18, 2014 at 10:40 AM PDT.

Also republished by Houston Area Kossacks, TexKos-Messing with Texas with Nothing but Love for Texans, and Turning Texas: Election Digest.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site