DISD's Mike Miles Says School Finance Ruling Is a Call for Legislators to Fix a Broken System

DallasHighSchool.jpg
Hasteur
Dallas ISD was one of more than 600 districts that sued the state over its massive budget cuts coupled with unfair allocation of funds and more curriculum requirements.

Last week's ruling by a state judge in Austin reaffirming that Texas' method of financing public schools is unconstitutional gives the Legislature a chance to repair a "resource gap" that's failing a growing population of impoverished children, Dallas school Superintendent Mike Miles says.

On Thursday, Judge John Dietz issued a written ruling confirming an earlier finding that the state doesn't provide enough money or distribute it fairly to districts across the state.

The latest round in Texas' decades-long battle over equity in school finance arrived in 2011 when the state cut more than $5 billion from the education budget. Over 600 school districts sued, saying that while the state cut the budget it was also raised curriculum requirements that caused districts to need more money. The system also disproportionately advantaged wealthier districts with a higher tax revenues. Many urban districts found that they ultimately received less money because of lower property taxes, causing a split between rich and poor districts.

While the current "Robin Hood" plan dictates that wealthier districts share a portion of their tax revenue with poorer districts, many districts claim this isn't enough to supplement state cuts, and residents in wealthier districts are frustrated that their tax money benefits schools outside their districts.

Dallas ISD was one of the districts that sued the state, and Miles praised Dietz's decision. "We have a district where we have a lot of student who come to us who are behind in proficiency, a lot of students whose second language is English, and a lot of students who are challenged by poverty," he says. "It would seem that districts that have those conditions would need more resources than the state is currently providing."

After the 2011 budget cuts, Dietz ruled in early 2013 that the finance system was unconstitutional because it didn't give enough money to schools to accommodate state academic curriculum, and was ultimately distributed inequitably. In the 2013 session, the state added more than $3 billion back to the education budget and scaled back standardized testing requirements. Dietz opened a second trial in January of this year to determine if the increased funding had fixed the balance in districts across the state. On Thursday he ruled that it did not.

"I think over time some inequities have been introduced, not on purpose but just as a state or district in our case gets more students who live in poverty. We're now at 90 percent free or reduced lunch," Miles says. "At same time we know the education landscape has changed, and you get a larger and larger resource gap. So I think that's the challenge going forward for the state, to make sure that the resource gap doesn't turn into achievement gap -- and it has in the past."

One example of a cost Dallas ISD has that suburban districts might not have, says Miles, is early childhood education. "We know that right now one of long-term plans is this investment in early childhood. And to invest in early childhood especially when you have many parents that live in poverty, it means we have to help out with preschool. We can't rely on large percentage of parents being able to pay for preschool," he says. "We know that if we want equity in education opportunities, that's a cost to us that a suburban district wouldn't have, at least to the same degree."

But while he calls Dietz's ruling a "positive step" in ensuring that kids who struggle with poverty don't also face an achievement gap, Miles and fellow supporters expect the decision will be appealed in the Texas Supreme Court. Still, Miles says the decision is a major victory in bringing attention to the budget discrepancy between districts. "I'm happy to see that there's a greater recognition that when kids are behind, when they struggle with poverty or are behind, it takes additional resources to move them forward," he says. "I don't always think money or material is the first resort, but it enforces academic matter, and if were going to get kids college and career ready by the time they graduate high school, we really have to invest more in them."

Looking forward to the next legislative session, Miles says the state needs to recognize that some districts have a higher financial need than others for programs like college and career preparation, or early childhood education. "I think it's one more call to the Legislature to take some action to develop a solution to the educational funding issues in the state," he says. "I'm a firm believer that people of good will want to see good things for kids. I think the Legislature will see this as a sign that they need to help schools. I think leaders in the state are going to find ways to help schools and districts."

While it's likely require more of a financial investment from the state, Miles says that's the cost of change and future improvement for chronically underfunded districts like Dallas ISD. "The education landscape has changed. If as a state we don't recognize that there have to be shifts in investment, then we're going to continue to have gaps." He added, "At the same time I might add I'm hopeful that collectively if we recognize the need, I'm sure our Legislature can come up with a good solution."


Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
21 comments
noblefurrtexas
noblefurrtexas topcommenter

Research has conclusively proved that more money does not equal better education.  What improves education are better teachers, more discipline of students, additional parental involvement, and a curriculum focused on time-tested core subjects instead of politically correct nonsense. 


More property-sufficient districts have been funding playing fields, natatoriums, better-paid coaches, and new gymnasiums for far too long.  Those districts that don't produce should be cut from the state largess, and the amount of "sharing" reduced. 


Robin hood is a very un-Texan way of funding schools.  But, it's also not the fault of better school districts that we have to pay for every illegal child in the state.  Get all of the welfare out of the budget, and focus available resources in teachers, books, music, and specialized learning such as wood shops and metal shops.

roo_ster
roo_ster

This seems like an opportune time to amend the Texas constitution and remove the gov't funded school mandate and replace it with a voucher system. Strap the cash to the kid's back and let the citizen parents send them where they think best.


Oh, and remove the obligation to educate illegal aliens.  If they want a free education, they have their own country in which to seek that.

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

There are two things that I believe are true about the public schools:


1) There is no correlation between funding per student and scholastic outcomes, there are just too many variables.


2) No superintendent will ever say that he has enough money for his district.

Tim.Covington
Tim.Covington

The only way this issue will ever be settled is if they completely eliminate school districts providing their own funding. But, that would also require the state to either raise taxes or pass some sort of new tax. 

fishingblues
fishingblues topcommenter

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul


Absolutely correct.  And here are a few more:


1.  Teachers should be paid based on their contribution and not on time on the job.


2.  Bottom 10% of teachers need to be continuously eliminated.


3.  Tenure is not a good thing.

4.   Unions are the worst thing to ever happen to the school system.


5.  Introduce competition for teachers and schools. 

BushwoodSmithie
BushwoodSmithie

@Tim.Covington


As the judge's decision is based on the state constitution, all that really needs to be done is to pass an amendment that school funding is at the discretion of the legislature. No telling how many tens of millions of dollars per year that would save in legal fees.


You have to love Miles complaining about the costs the DISD has that the suburban districts don't. He of course ignores the cost savings from the thousands (tens of thousands?) of responsible parents that pay DISD taxes but don't cost the district anything because they send their kids to private schools.


ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

@fishingblues @ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul 

The problem with #2 is that you will end up with another Enron type work atmosphere where employees end up stabbing each other in the back to make the other employee look worse.

I would recommend that the teachers be required to "meet expectations" in order to be retained.  Then perhaps you could force rank teacher performance in order to pay out bonuses.

In the long term, I think it is a better management technique to foster cooperation among employees in order to reach shared goals and objectives.


BTW, I do practice what I preach.

noblefurrtexas
noblefurrtexas topcommenter

@bvckvs @Tim.Covington You clearly haven't a clue about Republicans on the topic of education. 


Because research has proved, conclusively, that throwing money at education doesn't improve student or teacher performance, most Republicans I know focus attention on those things that DO improve education, while being more efficient with spending. 


But, until we can stop educating Mexico's ignorant children, we will waste a lot of money on translating and discipline instead of investing it in more efficient education.


noblefurrtexas
noblefurrtexas topcommenter

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul @fishingblues Teachers shouldn't be ranking other teachers. 


Teacher should be judged on results of their students, and their own knowledge of their subjects. 


I don't care if a teacher is popular with other teachers.  I care if teachers do an excellent job of teaching, encouraging a love of learning, and producing educated students.

fishingblues
fishingblues topcommenter

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul @fishingblues


#2 works in the real world.  If the supervisor has any smarts at all, inferior employees are not hard to weed out.  Employees stabbing each other in the back will obviously be noticed and dealt with.


In the real world, (unions, government jobs and public schools are not the real world) inferior work performance is not rewarded with continued employment.   

noblefurrtexas
noblefurrtexas topcommenter

@bvckvs @BushwoodSmithie @Tim.Covington Nobody gives a rat's behind about what color Miles is.  We've had failures in school superintendents in all colors, but mostly minorities. 


What people care about is the efficient application of hard-earned tax dollars in things that actually improve education. But, they also care about a focus in schools on core subjects rather than politically correct nonsense. 


If I'm going to pay for a child to be educated, I want to see a high school graduate ready to go to work or to college.

noblefurrtexas
noblefurrtexas topcommenter

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul @noblefurrtexas @fishingblues I wasn't suggesting you suggested that.  But, a former executive with Enron who I've gotten to know since he moved here from Houston, said that while many of their management and performance standards practices were designed to improve efficiency, the "human" survival factor was either ignored, or insufficiently discounted. 


North Texas University used to have a "management consulting" operation that came up with a number of innovative practices - including "values for learning" and "values for earning".  They used the Values Scale of 1-7 to describe what makes differently people tick differently, and then used those to influence communications and motivating practices in the business environment.  It was wildly successful.


But, they had a another imported practice where employees rated their bosses, their peers, and their subordinates.  It was a disaster.  Yet, Enron followed some of these same mistakes, and so have some schools. 


I totally agree about what it takes to meet and surpass expectations.  And, that means more teach knowledge, and testing who they teach to see if the teacher has been effective.

fishingblues
fishingblues topcommenter

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul @fishingblues


Since I have no idea what your definition of an "Enron type of environment" is, I cannot answer.


I did run a division for a NYSE company for several years.  So, I have an idea how the "real world" operates. 

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

@fishingblues @ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul 

Please see noblefurrtexas' comment below.

Based upon your response, it appears that you have not had much in the way of formal education on management techniques and organizing people and resources to achieve common objectives.


The human resource management failure at Enron is a classic study what not to do. Enron would terminate the bottom 10% regardless of whether or not the employe had positive contribution to the corporate goals.

Very simply, Enron ignored the human survival factor in their forced ranking employee evaluations.

The employees would come up with anything that would post a paper profit using the "mark to market" method of booking revenues.  It was not uncommon for proposals to have numbers that had no reality of ever coming to reality.

Simply put, when the goals of the individual employee diverge from the corporate goals, failure is bound to happen.  It is not a question of if, but rather a question of when.


BTW, Sears was once a NYSE company and look at them now.

TheCredibleHulk
TheCredibleHulk topcommenter

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul @fishingblues

I hear what you are saying, but I think the real problem there was the "mark-to-market" bullshit that was allowed to go on. Without that false incentive, that situation wouldn't have been nearly as bad as it was allowed to get.

fishingblues
fishingblues topcommenter

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul 


You took the 10% too literally.  Initially the number would likely be much higher.  After all, there are more failures in the public school system than successes.  Once the parasites, hangers on and incompetents are weeded out, the 10% is arbitrary.


Based on your post, it appears you received ALL of  your information from a book.    

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...