Thursday, October 16, 2014

FERC's Illegal abuse of NEPA -- EA Fast Track vs. full EIS

Here is the lowdown on the FERC a priori EA vs EIS decision
made prior to NEPA scoping!
They seem to decide before they have all the facts.

I credit Maya van Rossum of DRN for bringing this issue to my attention.

I think this is extremely damning.

May take a legal challenge, but we would
expect to see a lot of projects presently being
fast-tracked slowed down.

  • Dominion Cove Point LNG Export (CP13-113)
  • Dominion New Markets Project (CP14-497)
  • and the Arlington Gas Storage at Seneca Lake (CP13-83) 
  • ...and likely many others
... are all being fast-tracked with the illegal EA process.

You can actually see this illegal process on FERC's website, in their flowchart.
https://www.ferc.gov/help/processes/flow/lng-1.asp

Note well there is no path to convert an EA into an EIS.

Now read the NEPA Handbook!! You will see that after an EA, there should be a FOSI or FONSI determination. If a FOSI, then there MUST BE an EIS. However, this path is missing from the flowchart.

​terms:
  • FOSI = Finding of Significant Impact 
  • FONSI = Finding of No Significant Impact
  • EA = Envirionmental Assessment
  • EIS = Environmental Impact Statement (min. 2-3 years)

I do not see  the term "FONSI / FOSI" in the law itself  42 USC Title 15 (NEPA).

It originates in one of these locations:
There does seem to be a path whereby the application
does not need an EA to show a FOSI so as to trigger an EIS.

So the statement "an EA is required in either case" does not appear to be correct.
(I may have got this wrong earlier).

There is a legal fast-track to get to a FULL EIS,
but there is no legal fast track to AVOID a full EIS.

Only an EA can decide that upon the FOSI/FONSI determination.

In typical in-your-face style,
the FERC does not hide this fact they are doing this!!!
https://www.ferc.gov/help/processes/flow/lng-1.asp


The bad news is I see all kinds of ridiculous cases (including one involving Monsanto-- not a FERC case obviously, but still NEPA) where the courts showed a FONSI where clearly a FOSI is indicated.
The full EIS vs. the EA "Fast Track"
Here is JUST ONE WAY that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is violating the law (of many)

 

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

GOD BLESS YOU BOB HOWARTH!!!!!




I just heard you endorsed Howie! 
This is HUGE!

I am DANCING w/JOY!!

  • Also Don Barber, supervisor town of Caroline, prominent Democrat
  • Seth Peacock, Ithaca's first Black Judge and prominent Democrat
  • Matt Ryan, former Mayor of Binghamton, prominent Democrat!
  • Walter Hang wrote, "Howie Hawkins, the honorable Green Party Gubernatorial Candidate,
    supports
    killing the DOH "review" and the Draft SGEIS.  He also pledged to ban fracking if elected."
  • Cris McConkey, Shaleshock Media -- "Business as usual is no longer an option. I MUST vote for Howie."

Know of any other big-name academics, scientists,
health professional, or attorneys etc
who want to join the winning team?

Mathematically, the WIN is easy to demonstrate:
  • 1 person gets 8 friends
      in one day. (yes, a stretch goal).

  • Then these each get 8 more next day.
In just 7 days we reach 2.0 million people.
(8 ^ 7) = 2,097,152

We have 20 days and only need 1.5 M for the win.


(We get a BIG PUSH from early celebrity
endorsements like yours!)


We have the internet!
and phones and our legs.

If someone can make a shnazzy video
to give this message, and if the video gets ... say 4,000 hits,

if this video can translate into just 4,000 viewers 
motivated to get 8 friends, etc...
then we just need 3 days to reach 2M people.

Remember this? (our recent history)


  • 13,000 comments on the dSGEIS
    -- A Miracle!

  • 67,000 comments on the rdSGEIS
    -- NO WAY! Another Miracle!

  • 204,000 comments on the regs
    -- Wow... A lucky streak? (over Christmas too!)

  • 400,000 people in the streets
    NYC / People's Climate March -- Holy God.

    For a moment, even the frackers got silent and took notice.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8h4M6qD7tE

Four Miracles in a Row?
Can we make ONE MORE?
1,500,000?  => YES it is possible!!!




Speaking of 400,000... Here is 400,000 years of climate record:




So it seems urgent that we take BOLD ACTION.

Pennsylvania does not have a candidate.
WE* DO!!
(*New York)



With Howie, it's like we're holding an ACE
and the Blackjack table has a HOT DECK
(lots of 10 cards left). 

The winning strategy is to signal ALL OF OUR FRIENDS
to this table and to MAKE BIG BETS!
  • Precipice of Climate Catastrophe
  • PLUS Massive Social Movement in response
  • PLUS a STRONG progressive candidate for a major US State!
I have never seen a setup like this in 30 years or more.

This is a REALLY RARE and AUSPICIOUS MOMENT.
I am praying that we fully take advantage of this opportunity.
 
God bless you my friend Bob Howarth!!!
We can turn this into
100,000 votes for Howie OR MORE!

 
Howie was at 60,000 four years ago
+ est. 100,000 more votes due to your endorsement alone
= 160,000 => now rough guess,
maybe 300,000.

We only need to get each present Howie supporter
to each get 5-10 more  FOR THE WIN in 20 days.

THIS IS POSSIBLE!

Thank you x 10,000!!




--
--
May you, and all beings
be happy and free from suffering :)
-- ancient Buddhist Prayer (Metta)

Don't forget to sign the
Pledge to Resist
the Constitution Pipeline:

Dont be silenced by FERC! Comment NOW on Dominion's plan to bring more FRACKED GAS into NY


Photo: BH


This just in from an ad hoc team of folks looking over the Dominion New Market Project. 
I don't see any official group name or author, but I will tell you this has been produced
and vetted by some of the top frack-fighters in the state.

So IMO you should consider this ... "important" :) -- BH

PS: Remember: Sharing is caring :)


Comment NOW on Dominion's plan to bring more FRACKED GAS into NEW YORK!
Thank you to everyone who attended FERC's terribly-conducted scoping hearing last week on Dominion's "New Market Project." Threatening to bring a billion more cubic feet of fracked gas into New York every day, Dominion Transmission Inc. wants to squeeze more gas into its aging pipeline network by building two massive compressor stations and dramatically expanding a third. These three compressor stations alone would dump 200,000 additional tons of greenhouse gas emissions and cancer-causing air pollutants into the atmosphere every year.
Those who were at the hearing saw first-hand how FERC was totally unprepared for the opposition it received, even admitting that it made a big mistake by scheduling just one hearing in an illegally overcrowded room. But now we need to drive home the message that apologies are not good enough.

We must demand that FERC schedule MORE SCOPING HEARINGS in each of the affected areas, especially where the THREE massive compressor stations are proposed: HORSEHEADS, GEORGETOWN, and BROOKMAN CORNERS. And we must demand that FERC extend the OFFICIAL time period for submitting scoping comments so that communities, organizations, and individuals have fair and adequate opportunity to weigh in on how FERC reviews Dominion's proposed project.

But until we hear otherwise, the official deadline for scoping comments is still October 20th, which means that your help is needed right now! Here's how to comment:

TO COMMENT ONLINE:

Submitting comments electronically is actually the best way, but it's a bit tricky.
It involves using the "eComment" feature on FERC's website http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp , begin the process by clicking the orange and white "eComment" tab in the middle of the page. (To send attachments, you have to use the "eFiling" feature and first create an account using the "eRegister" feature.)

You'll receive another email after this one with detailed instruction for how to submit comments to FERC using "eComment". But if you still have trouble commenting online, don't let that stop you! You can still send your comments in by paper mail.
  
TO COMMENT BY PAPER MAIL:

Send written comments to:

Kimberly D. Bose. Secretary
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street NE, Room 1A
Washington, DC 20426

All scoping comments must be received by October 20th. So for paper mailing, please post-mark by October 18th.
And be sure to identify the docket number for the Dominion "New Market" Project, which is CP14-497-000.


HERE ARE SOME POINTS TO MAKE IN YOUR COMMENTS: 
In addition to objecting to the project, please insist that the following be part of FERC's scope of review.

--- It is outrageous that FERC scheduled only one scoping hearing for a major project that impacts much of New York and 200 miles of pipeline. FERC must schedule additional scoping hearings in affected areas, especially where compressor stations would be built or significant expanded in Horseheads (Chemung County), Georgetown (Madison County), and Brookman Corners (Montgomery County near Otsego County). FERC must also extend the OFFICIAL deadline for scoping comments by at least 90 days so that communities, organizations, and individuals have adequate opportunity to weigh in on how FERC will review Dominion's proposed project.

--- FERC should require a full Environmental Impacts Statement (EIS) instead of letting Dominion pursue an expedited Environmental Assessment (EA). The EIS process would require a much more comprehensive analysis of technical and safety issues relating to carrying an additional 112,000 Dekatherms of gas per day in Dominion's aging pipeline network, as well as a more thorough analysis of all direct, indirect, and cumulative induced impacts. A full EIS should be performed.

--- The increased risk of pipeline failure and catastrophic fire or explosion due to higher pressure and flow rate must be fully analyzed--especially since parts of Dominion's network are up to 50 years old, corrosion, degradation, or other stresses have likely occurred over time, and the original pipe may have been constructed using inferior welding methods. Maximum allowable operating pressure must be disclosed and verified. This danger impacts not only people living near compressor stations, but along the ENTIRE Dominion pipeline corridor.

--- Dominion has named this its "New Market Project" because it wants to create new markets for fracked gas. Therefore, a comprehensive build-out analysis of the negative cumulative impacts resulting from increased use of gas should be performed (including the likelihood of future power plants, CNG/LNG facilities, and other types of gas-infrastructure). A build-out analysis should also be performed of negative environmental, health, and societal impacts of more drilling and fracking enabled by additional pipeline capacity.

--- The Dominion pipeline connects to the Iroquois pipeline, which is planned for reversal so that it will carry gas from the U.S. to Canada. Dominion will therefore be a conduit, in part, for exporting gas out of the United States. FERC must analyze this conflict in determining domestic public need. It is also improper segmentation to consider this project without regard to all of the economic and environmental impacts of exporting natural gas, which the project facilitates.

--- A comprehensive health impact assessment should be performed to evaluate the negative effects, short and long-term, to people living near and at various distances from the proposed compressor stations. Exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOC's), nitrogen oxides, ground-level ozone, and other hazardous air pollutants from compressor stations can cause cardiovascular, respiratory, and neurological damage; birth defects, cancer; leukemia; infertility; burning of lungs, eyes, and throat; muscle pain; mental impairment, headaches, and a host of other acute and chronic illnesses. In particular, VOC's from the Brookman Corners compressor station would be 16 times higher than levels at the other two stations, Nitrogen Oxides would be three times higher, and Carbon Monoxide would be 5 times higher. Dominion MUST propose design alternatives to protect the public from this level of exposure. 

--- With the construction and expansion of two compressor stations in Horseheads and Georgetown, and the massive expansion of another one at Brookman Corners, Dominion would pump over 200,000 TONS of greenhouse gas and hazardous chemicals into the air every year, create noise pollution, impact wildlife, and industrialize pristine rural areas. These environmental, health, and community impacts must be comprehensively studied. Dominion claims that greenhouse gas emissions from the Brookman Corners compressor station alone would be just under the 100,000 TON threshold for a major emitter. This level is suspect and would certainly be exceeded if routine blowdowns and other activities are considered.

--- The public must be granted full access to information, including critical energy infrastructure information (CEII) necessary to assess emissions and safety factors. Local fire-fighters and emergency responders are often volunteers and may not be equipped or trained to respond to catastrophic events such as uncontrolled gas fires, explosion, and widespread exposure of the public to gas and airborn toxic chemicals that could be released during an incident. Response capability and the need for additional training or full-time responders must be thoroughly evaluated.

--- Safety and compliance records of Dominion must be disclosed in the record and considered by FERC.


THANK YOU FOR COMMENTING!




INSTRUCTIONS for filing eCOMMENTS with FERC on Dominion's "New Market Project"

 (Thank you to Suzy Winkler for preparing these great instructions.)
Again, if you have trouble with any of this, send your comments in by paper mail as explained above.


The following instructions will help you file comments about Dominion's proposed project electronically using the "eComment” feature on FERC's website. First you fill out a brief form on FERC's website. Then FERC will then send you an email with a link allowing you to cut and paste your comment online.

Follow these instructions:

1)  Write a comment on your computer and save it. When it's time to enter your comment on the FERC website (#9 below), you will then be able to copy and paste your comment into the allotted space.

2)  Go to:    http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp

3) Click on the orange and white "eComment" button. An authorization page will open.
Fill in your name, address, email address and phone number.

4)  Type in the letters and numbers that you see in the gray box and choose the "Authorize" button.

5)  FERC will send you an email with a link. 
Select the link, which takes you to FERC's website. A form with your name and email will appear.

6) In the box marked "Enter Docket Number," fill in CP14-497 (with no spaces)

7) Click on the "Search" button and wait a moment for a response.
Choose the blue plus sign in the far right column under the “Select" heading and wait a moment for a response.

8)  Ignore the new blue box with additional information that appears on the screen.
Find the box for entering your comment slightly below. The system will allow you to enter up to 6000 characters.


9)  Cut and paste your previously prepared comment (from #1) into the box.

10)  Click on the "Send Comment" button in the lower left corner of the screen.

11)  FERC will send you an email saying that your comment has been received. This is your confirmation.
Please save the email.

12)  In the email there will be a link to view your comment in the "eLibrary"

** If you use the "Safari" browser on your computer, this process may give you trouble. For some computers it does and for others it works fine. If the system isn't responding as described above sImply download the "Firefox" browser from the internet and you will be in good shape to move forward.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Unlike in PA, New York has a choice!









What is the next in this series? 13,000... 67,000... 204,000... 400,000....


What is the next in this series?

13,000...   2010 comments on the draft SGEIS (on fracking)
67,000...  2012 comments on the revised draft SGEIS
204,000...  2013 comments on the fracking regs
400,000....  2014 People's Climate March

Could it be, oh... just throwing out a guess...
1.5 Million?




It will ONLY take 1..5 million votes
in a 3 way race to WIN the NY Gubernatorial Election.


For reference,
here's the graph of 400,000 years
of climate data:





So let's image that we are in a SERIOUS CLIMATE CRISIS moment.

But let's say we have this AMAZING and MASSIVE
popular movement in response!

And let's also say we have a BALLOT LINE with an amazing
and popular candidate who represents our values.


  • Friends, 13,000 was a MIRACLE in 2010.
  • NO ONE EXPECTED 67,000--  a BIGGER miracle in 2012!
  • BUT THEN, 204,000 WAS A BIGGER MIRACLE!
    ... and then!! 400,000 was an even bigger miracle in 2014!

Do you think we can GET OUT THE VOTE and rally 1.5 million people
to the polls on Nov 4, 2014 given we only have 3 weeks?

I DID NOT SAY THE NAME of any candidate in this email.
I'm just saying: IMAGINE IT!

1.5 Million People in 3 weeks is
TOTALLY POSSIBLE!

We have the Internet and we have
Telephones and OUR LEGS!

Friends they DO NOT HAVE a progressive
anti-fracking candidate in Pennsylvania.


They have a) FRACK HARD,
vs. b) FRACK GENTLY.

Voters in PA might as well STAY HOME.

In New York: WE DO!!
Are we going to let this opportunity pass us by?

If we are to get 1.5 million people
we need BOLD, SWIFT ACTION!

We need to
GET BUSY!!!




--
--
May you, and all beings
be happy and free from suffering :)
-- ancient Buddhist Prayer (Metta)

Don't forget to sign the
Pledge to Resist
the Constitution Pipeline:

Need big NY 501c3s to produce a VOTER'S GUIDE ASAP!

There is NO PROHIBITION of political activities by 501c3 non-profits

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/501

(3)
Corporations, and any community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes, or to foster national or international amateur sports competition (but only if no part of its activities involve the provision of athletic facilities or equipment), or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual, no substantial part of the activities of which is carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting, to influence legislation (except as otherwise provided in subsection (h)), and which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.

501c3's CAN distribute statements to influence legislation (as long as it is not a "substantial part" of activities).

Also 501c3's can produce neutral VOTER'S GUIDES.

I suggest the big anti-fracking non profits in the state
produce a neutral VOTERS GUIDE on the Gubernatorial race.

Peace Action (501c3) has done this for years.
You just have to structure it so the person has to read it,
and one choice does not jump out at you.


WRONG WAY:


Question 1
Question 2
Question 3
Question 4

Sally Swell
YES
YES
YES
YES
This is the candidate with our values,
this JUMPS OUT at you...
Joe Schmoe
Yes
No
Yes
No

Carl Creepo
No
No
No
Yes



Right Way:


Question 1
Question 2
Question 3
Question 4

Sally Swell
No
Yes
No
Yes
This is the candidate with our values. But you have to
carefully read the questions to get this.
Joe Schmoe
Yes
No
Yes
No

Carl Crap
No
No
No
Yes




Let me remind you of this. What's the next point on the chart?




It will ONLY take 1.5 Million votes for a WIN!


--
--
May you, and all beings
be happy and free from suffering :)
-- ancient Buddhist Prayer (Metta)

Don't forget to sign the
Pledge to Resist
the Constitution Pipeline:

Friday, October 10, 2014

Wow! Excellent documentary from RT

This is really excellent, features a lot of friends in PA.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YD6tGHM6e8w

Watch and SHARE!

--
--
May you, and all beings
be happy and free from suffering :)
-- ancient Buddhist Prayer (Metta)

Don't forget to sign the
Pledge to Resist
the Constitution Pipeline:

Thursday, October 9, 2014

Howie Tours Dimock (and other news)




Governor Andrew Cuomo
told Eric Weltman of Food & Water Watch
(on Primary Day) -- that he would take a tour of the Gasfields of Pennsylvania 
 & meet with the victims of fracking.

Listen Carefully to the exchange starting at 0:57:
http://vimeo.com/105701253


Anyway, we're still waiting on that.

Rob Astorino (#Gastorino) has said
he will take an industry-led tour
(fitting, as it seems like he is led by industry!


Meanwhile, Howie Hawkins for NY Governor
took a tour today, a citizens tour, where he learned  about things that Cabot won't mention,
and was taken to places Cabot tries to dismiss.




Vera Scroggins of Susquehanna County, who led the tour,
made a personal invitation to Governor Cuomo
and offered to give him
a guided tour, as she has done for members of Canadian Parliament,
New York State Senators, foreign journalists, and many other dignitaries.

Howie and Vera in Dimock, PA
touring sites of water contamination
determined by PA DEP to be caused by gas drilling


Members of the media were invited to ride along
on the 30 passenger bus with Howie's entourage.


Howie's campaign manager Ursula Rozum told me,
"Every day, Howie's base gets stronger, and more
Zephyr Teachout supporters, such as
education policy expert Diane Ravitch, get on board
for Hawkins / Jones on the Green Party line.
Howie's extremely popular among New York teachers
and teacher's unions, due to his strong commitment
to a strong public education system, including tenure,
adequate funding, and his opposition to High Stakes Testing.

And he's massive among New York's grassroots
Anti-Fracking community, where he has some
very high-profile backing".

Madison County FERC Update

Meanwhile last night in Madison County, 200+ people packed into the Georgetown Town Hall

--which has a maximum safe capacity of 132 according to the fire marshal-- 

to attend a public hearing by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
on a pipeline project which would span 200 miles

and would pump 200,000 tons per year of pollutants
into the atmosphere we all breathe.

It was not listed on their website, and there was only ONE hearing scheduled.
.
​photo: Suzy Winkler

The FERC rep said he didn't expect this "this level of interest".

Uh, really?

I guess he has not been paying attention to this:
  • Jan 2010: 13,000 comments dSGEIS (draft fracking permit conditions)
  • Jan 2012: 67,000 comments rdSGEIS (revised draft fracking permit conditions)
  • Jan 2013: 204,000 comments on the Fracking Regs
oh.... and then, this...


Just imagine if all these people voted for someone

who represents their values...
Just this once!

But that would take a miracle...





Maybe if we DREAM BIG, 
we can create another one?

Let's take BOLD ACTION 
motivated with TRUTH and COMPASSION
then EXPECT MIRACLES!



--
--
May you, and all beings
be happy and free from suffering :)
-- ancient Buddhist Prayer (Metta)

Don't forget to sign the
Pledge to Resist
the Constitution Pipeline:

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

FERC: CEASE AND DESIST


There are many eyes on FERC now. 
Here is their Chairman, Cheryl A. LaFleur.




Madam Chairman --

I speak as an individual, not for any group.
But I speak for many.

This is a WRIT of the People

  • We have come to understand that FERC is a rogue agency,
    which
    defies the People's Law and ignores directives of the Federal Courts.
  • We can see that FERC's public participation process is a Farce and a FRAUD
    in violation of Federal Law and the United States Constitution.
  • FERC has unconscionably delegated important permitting authority
    to the American Petroleum Institute, without authorization from Congress.
  • FERC allows --without sanction!-- jurisdictional facilities to be constructed
    WITHOUT A PERMIT, in violation of the Natural Gas Act.
  • FERC makes urgent safety decisions based on obsolete models (such as
    "High Consequence Areas" and "Potential Impact Radius") which places
    many lives at risk.

  • FERC allows people in rural areas to be exposed to exceptional and unacceptable risks
    for the benefit of corporate profits, in violation of the United States Constitution's promise
    of Equal Protection of the Law.
  • FERC has failed to consider upstream and downstream impacts of Fracked Gas,
    which has been requested, demanded in DOZENS of different dockets.
  • FERC routinely fails to consider the NO ACTION alternative,
    despite the pleas of The People and as required by Federal Law (NEPA). 
  • FERC continues to SEGMENT projects, in violation of National Environmental
    Policy Act, and in DEFIANCE of the order of a Federal Judge.
  • FERC derives its authority from Congress, which derives its just powers
    from We the People.

    Yet FERC clearly regards the People of these states with contempt,
    and acts in utter disregard for our safety and well-being.
  • FERC routinely denies rehearing requests, and when granted, favors industry
    in every case
    , in violation of your charter to uphold the Public Interest, Convenience,
    and Necessity.
  • In many cases, FERC is complicit in allowing a loud MOB of bussed in bullies
    to intimidate affected parties who come to public hearings to express legitimate
    environmental and safety concerns.
  • By granting permits to pipeline companies which operate using FRAUD, COERCION,
    THREATS, HARASSMENT, BRIBERY, and EXTORTION, the FERC seems to be a
    operating as a CRIMINAL SYNDICATE under the definition of the RICO Act, which
    was created to serve "the elimination of the infiltration of organized crime and
    racketeering
    into legitimate organizations operating in interstate commerce".
  • FERC is complicit in hiding critical safety information from The People necessary
    for us to understand the safety risks, or to perform an independent safety audit.
  • FERC is guilty of allowing Fraudulent, Incomplete, and Deceptive filings
    to be made by industry without consequence in violation of the Natural Gas Act.
  • FERC grants permits to corporations with atrocious safety and compliance records,
    in violation of the Natural Gas Act, which says in such cases, the "application shall
    be denied"
    .

Chairman, Cheryl A. LaFleur -- HEAR THIS NOW!

The FERC Commissioners are acting in ways
which clearly place MANY HUMAN LIVES AT RISK.


We consider these activities ILLEGAL and CRIMINAL.
FERC-- Here THIS!  

You must CEASE AND DESIST
these unlawful and treasonous activities.

We DEMAND that you obey the Natural Gas Act,
and the National Environmental Policy Act
and all laws of the Nation and these States.

YOU ARE ON NOTICE.



--
--
May you, and all beings
be happy and free from suffering :)
-- ancient Buddhist Prayer (Metta)

Don't forget to sign the
Pledge to Resist
the Constitution Pipeline:

The Dominion New Market Project-Killer

How Pipeline Corrosion affects Operating Pressure*
By BH

(* or, "Why putting 33,000 HP of additional compression
     into a 50 y/o pipe might not be such a smart idea.")

In fact, it is a really stupid idea.
 
In my opinion, this goes right to the core
of why this project should be rejected.
 
In a nutshell:

A Steel Pipeline stores lots of potential energy.
  • A Steel Pipe in the ground is also a Battery
    Stores Potential Energy (chemically).
    THIS IS WHY CORROSION HAPPENS.
  • A Compressed Spring or a Piano Wire under tension
    stores energy mechanically .

  • A Rolled Steel Pipe is like a compressed spring
    or a tight piano wire.

  • Stored potential energy, like a wound spring,
    wants to release this energy, often with
    catastrophic results.

  • The Dominion Pipeline Transports Mostly Methane. 
  • Methane is stored (chemical) Energy.

  • The Dominion pipeline transports now AT LEAST 92,000 dth/d.
    + 112,000 dth/day New Market = 204,000 dth/day.

  • This is equivalent energy of 3 Hiroshima Bombs per day. 

Corrosion affects Max Operating Pressure

  • Pipe Corrosion is Inevitable
    This is due to the "battery" effect stored in the metal.

  • Metal Corrosion is Metal Loss
    The wall thickness will DECREASE over time.

  • Pipe Thickness Determines Max Safe Operating Pressure
    SEE: Barlow's Formula: http://tridentsteel.com/barlows-formula/

    P=Max Safe Operating Pressure        S=Material Yeild Strength
    T=wall Thickness                                OD=DIameter
    SF=Safety Factor
  • THEREFORE: the Max Safe Pressure MUST DECREASE Over Time

  • THE DOMINION NEW MARKET PROJECT WILL INCREASE
    PRESSURE on a 55 y/o pipe

  • This defies what physics demands.

This short video about Cathodic Protection (CP) talks a lot about corrosion.
Warning: he is a salesman for CP systems, so he is a little over-optomistic
about the effectiveness about CP's ability to PREVENT corrosion. If you
watch the whole thing, the truth is revealed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2ZZEQUl05w



I talked about Barlow's Formula (which determines
the Maximum Pressure for a pipeline) here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAd06PyldJY#t=27m09s
Watch from 27:09 to ~31:30.



--
--
May you, and all beings
be happy and free from suffering :)
-- ancient Buddhist Prayer (Metta)

Don't forget to sign the
Pledge to Resist
the Constitution Pipeline: