The Dallas Police Department Is Replacing Its Old Stun Guns With Better Stun Guns

Categories: News

taser.jpg
hermanturnip
The Dallas Police Department is swapping its old Tasers for new-and-improved models.
In the next three to four months, all Dallas police officers on patrol will be equipped with new, smart Tasers that are safer than their predecessors, Chief David Brown said at Wednesday's City Council meeting. After the council approved a five-year deal with Taser International Inc. for the purchase and maintenance of Tasers, the department's 700 or so old Tasers will be replaced with 2,000.

"We haven't in the past had a lot of Tasers in our department," Brown said at a town hall meeting last month. "Because of the challenges with Tasers causing deaths early on, our department backed off of Tasers several years back."

The department has a strict Taser policy, Brown told the council Wednesday, because of deaths linked to the high-voltage stunning devices around the country. The most recent in Dallas happened in 2010, when police tased Freddie Locket while he was high, which can cause complications when being stunned, according to WFAA.

The Tasers the department is purchasing now are much safer for suspects. The devices "stop or reduce the electrical charge that has not had the same outcomes from the initial Tasers several years ago," Brown said at last month's town hall.

Before the city council, Brown added that the Taser policy could be relaxed now because of the new safety features. He said he wanted officers to use Tasers "before they use a gun and before they have to get into a physical fight with suspects." But he doesn't want officers overusing Tasers because of a of lawsuits, he said.

Next month, the first batch of officers will begin training to use the new Tasers, which will include aiming for a suspect's torso because that's what Taser International recommends, Brown said. The smart tasers also collect data on whether the prongs struck their target, and the department will be able to better train officers based on that information, Brown said.

"We're also moving toward body cameras," he said, "so the Taser use will be caught on camera at some point as well."

Though the new Tasers are safer than the old ones the department has now, they are still a potential lethal threat for people with heart problems. This is where the policy comes into play, Brown said.

"We need to ask those questions when we're on the phone, responding to the call, [ask about] their pre-existing conditions, things that we do prior to our interaction with suspects to try to mitigate the Taser-caused death," Brown told the council. "Pre-existing medical conditions do have an effect on the lethality of the Taser."

Despite this, at the town hall meeting last month, Brown said, "We feel comfortable expanding our use of Tasers. [They're] a less-than-lethal enforcement tool you can take on patrol, particularly, in some of the ways that our officers deal with the mentally ill who might be violent but might not necessarily deserve some of the outcomes that we have been experiencing."

He may have been referring to Jason Harrison, the man with schizophrenia Dallas officers shot and killed in June. Harrison's mother had called the police about her son many times, and every time but the last one officers calmed him down without shooting. At that last incident, police say Harrison "made an aggressive act" toward an officer with a screwdriver.

Send your story tips to the author, Sky Chadde.


My Voice Nation Help
13 comments
kduble
kduble

If the choice is a taser or truncheons à la Rodney King, I pick the taser.

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

Just remember that tasers are not non-lethal; they are less lethal than a gun.


Given that they now have to ask on the phone about any medical conditions that would contraindicate the use of tasers, I wonder if they will also now start asking the following questions:


1) Are you allergic to lead?

2) How will you respond if 3 very large and very muscular men have to whup up on your ass if you don't do what they tell you to do?

3) Will you take a deep breath, chill out and quit threatening or annoying the people where you are so that we don't have to come out there and do #1 or #2?


PS:  The police do not get into fights.  The police use the requisite amount of force to put someone into submission.  This amount of force that the police use is directly proportional to the level of resistance that someone provides.

Think of it this way.  It is like hitting your head against a brick wall.  The brick wall hits back only as hard as you hit.  Also don't forget that the brick wall always wins.

everlastingphelps
everlastingphelps topcommenter

 He said he wanted officers to use Tasers "before they use a gun 


Yes.


and before they have to get into a physical fight with suspects."


NO.  It's supposed to be an alternative to lethal force, not to rid the officers of inconvenience.  It needs to be further up the continuum of force than grappling.  If they have a weapon, meaning that you can't grapple them and would have to shoot, absolutely, use the taser if you have time.  But not to just save the cops some wrestling.


 But he doesn't want officers overusing Tasers because of a of lawsuits, he said.


Yeah, glad to hear it's lawsuits that slow you down, and not human decency and a desire to not having officers electrocute citizens without cause.

wcvemail
wcvemail

First! and I'm glad I'm not first to be tased with the new, improved tasers. That honor will go either to a police rookie, or the first person who says, "Huh?" to that police rookie.

ozma207
ozma207

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul "The police use the requisite amount of force to put someone into submission." That is the expectation. However, expectations are not always met.

roo_ster
roo_ster

@everlastingphelps 

Nowadays tasers are not alternatives to lethal force, they are electronic whips used to gain compliance.


This is how they have been used in every single youtube video I have seen that has a LEO using a Taser.

James080
James080

@everlastingphelps 

I disagree. The taser should be used to prevent a physical fight. Cops carry guns. Criminals physically engaging cops usually try to grab the cop's gun in the course of the fight. The taser should be used to avoid the fight.

lecterman
lecterman

@everlastingphelps As a practitioner of jiu jitsu, I recommend that the city pay for all officers to be trained in some sort of grappling (BJJ, catch wresting, etc.) as a method of subduing an unarmed, non-compliant individual.


Maybe that would help boost the officers' self-confidence and enable them to use non-lethal forms of detainment rather than using a lethal weapon as their primary form.


The officers I train with seem to agree with me at least.

everlastingphelps
everlastingphelps topcommenter

@James080 @everlastingphelps Criminals do not usually try to grab a cop's gun in the course of a fight.  My evidence: the lack of a pile of corpses from the people that cops have had to kill for trying to grab their gun.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...