Jason Harrison's Father Sues Dallas and the Police Officers Who Killed His Son

Categories: Crime

Google Maps
The site of Jason Harrison's death.
David Harrison, whose mentally ill son Jason Harrison died at the hands of Dallas police in June, filed a lawsuit on Friday claiming two officers used excessive force when they shot his son six times within minutes of arriving at the son's home on Glencairn Drive.

Linda Turley, David Harrison's lawyer, writes in the lawsuit that officers John Rogers and Andrew Hutchins shot Jason Harrison "multiple times when Jason Sherard Harrison, an unarmed man, did not pose a risk of injury to himself or others." The police have said that the younger Harrison had a screwdriver in his hand and made an aggressive act toward the officers, causing them to open fire.

Both officers and the city of Dallas are named as defendants.

One of the officers was wearing a body camera that day, but the footage has not been released to the public or to the family because the case is still under investigation. Chief David Brown has said the recording confirms the two officers' statements.

See also: Dallas Police's Final, Fatal Encounter with a Schizophrenic

Harrison alleges that his son posed no threat to anyone, including the officers, that day. Police had been called to the house many times before to help subdue the 38-year-old Harrison, whom family members believed suffered from schizophrenia.

By shooting him, the officers violated Harrison's Fourth Amendment right to due process, the lawsuit claims; it also alleges the police department has a history using excessive force.

"The City of Dallas, acting through the Dallas Police Department and officers of the Dallas Police Department, has engaged in the persistent and widespread practice of using excessive force, including deadly force, establishing a custom and practice of excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States," Turley writes.

See also: Group of Black Lawyers and Judges Seeks Dallas Police Data to Root Out Brutality

Family members of Jason Harrison have attended both town hall meetings hosted by District Attorney Craig Watkins and have asked, sometimes through tears, to see the footage from the day he was killed.

So far, they haven't received an answer that has satisfied them, even though Chief Brown has told them the police can't legally hand over the tape as it might disrupt a grand jury investigation into the shooting.

Turley says Harrison's father wants to know what happened to his son, but he also wants to change how the department deals with people who are mentally ill.

"In light of the historic use of excessive and deadly force by the Dallas Police Department, there was an obvious need for additional and/or different training in the use of force, and in dealing with mental illness," Turley writes.

His son's death has caused him extreme grief, Turley writes. "Mr. Harrison buried his son," she continues, "it is supposed to be the other way around."

David Harrison Complaint


Send your story tips to the author, Sky Chadde.

My Voice Nation Help
29 comments
jasonw30
jasonw30

If the deceased posed no threat to the police or anyone that day, why were Dallas Police called to the house multiple times to help subdue him?  The police aren't a mobile nanny service, although some might believe they are.


The family hasn't received answers that satisfied them because they don't want to hear the truth

lzippitydoo
lzippitydoo

How do the police know if someone attacking them is mentally ill?? When I look at the law firm (one of the ambulance chaser ones) handling the lawsuit of the city - then you can easily tell it is a money ploy!

holmantx
holmantx topcommenter

"The two-inch thick report also chronicled Brown's brief stay at a psychiatric hospital in 2006. He was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, admitted smoking marijuana daily and thought God was talking to him. The report said Brown stopped taking his medication."

Chief Brown's son was killed last year by police after he killed two, including the officer who shot and killed him.

I think Chief Brown has some relatable experience in this matter.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

Cops = cowardly trigger-happy homicidal Neanderthal scum

GatoCat
GatoCat

Ordinary Joe Blow posting a comment on the internet may be excused, if not forgiven, for confusing "whose" and "who's".  For a journalist, it's inexcusable.

bvckvs
bvckvs topcommenter

@GatoCat 

Dallas Observer's writers are not journalists; they're commentators - like Rush Limbaugh,  Bill O'Reilly and the AM radio talk show hosts.

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@GatoCat

A tragedy even.

bmarvel
bmarvel topcommenter

@bvckvs @GatoCat I (somewhat reluctantly) come to the defense of DO's writers.

I'd love to know what you thought you were saying, bvckvs, as you were typing that DO's "writers are not journalists; they're commentators"? Comment is journalism -- last time I looked -- and informed comment is journalism of a very high order. Bad commentary, shoot-from-the-hips commentary, is punditry.

Jim Schutze is an excellent journalist and commentator when he's not being a pundit. A number of other writers who have passed through DO's staff have become very fine journalists. 

But DO grabs them when they're very young and fresh out of school, milks them for copy for a couple years, then discards them for fresher (and cheaper) meat. It's very cynical. For a young journalist, weeklies like DO were about the only ladder up into the business. Now that ladders being reeled in.

Due to a number of circumstances all alternative weeklies are in a sad decline. When it was still good, DO did important stories that nobody else in town (read DMN) would touch. Now its usually a yawn, something to idly scan over your migas at Cafe Brazil, then forget. I don't know where young journalists will go in the future to learn the craft. Probably online, where they'll get no guidance or instruction and only their mothers will read them.

Mindless criticism of the DO or the DMN or D or any other medium will not solve the problem. In fact, it exacerbate the problem because it shows that you are not really reading, just mindlessly reacting. ("...are not journalists; they're commentators.")  Journalism needs all the intelligent critical readers it can get. Instead it's getting neither readers nor intelligence. 


bvckvs
bvckvs topcommenter

@bmarvel @bvckvs @GatoCat 

Seriously?  You honestly don't know the difference between "journalist" and "commentator"?  Just when I think I've got a bead on how uninformed you are, you take it down another notch.

I was talking to a shrink the other day who told me I need to tone it down - that most people aren't as smart as I am and that I need to be more sensitive to their feelings.  And a few years back, a girlfriend broke up with me and in a shrieking fit yelled, "Why do you always have to be right?!".

I've always thought of myself as average, but I'm beginning to think the dumb people are right about me.  It certainly goes a long way toward explaining why I'm so much more comfortable in a teacher's lounge or at the student union, than in a sports bar.

TheCredibleHulk
TheCredibleHulk topcommenter

@bvckvs 

LOL. You always bring the laffs.

So you think that because your (no doubt, crazy) ex-GF thinks you have some sort of pathological need to always feel like you are in the right, that you are indeed always "right"?

Trust me, you are faaaaaaaar from average.

noblefurrtexas
noblefurrtexas topcommenter

@bvckvs In a previous life, journalists might have often been exclusively writers, but our own Benjamin Franklin broke that mold.. He was a journalist, a writer, a commentator, a humorist, etc. 


There are a number of journalists who are commentators.  Some are from print, some are from broadcasting, 


As a news discipline, journalists are reporters, but also write editorials. Editorials are part opinion, part commentary, and part Ouija Board.  But, the lines blur in these areas.  Yet, the writers of same are usually journalists. 

Heck, there are even journalists who are PR people with companies. 

That said, glad you're getting treatment. 



DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@bvckvs "I was talking to a shrink the other day who told me I need to tone it down - that most people aren't as smart as I am and that I need to be more sensitive to their feelings"


He was using reverse psychology.


hth.

bmarvel
bmarvel topcommenter

@bvckvs Yeah, bvckvs, seriously.

I do know the difference between journalism and commentary, which was original my point, had you grasped it.

But after five-plus decades of being a journalist, of teaching journalism from time to time, and of studying the historic roots of journalism, I am no longer -- if I ever was -- able to draw a firm line between those journalists who write commentary and commentators whose work is based firmly on reporting. 

If you are able to draw such a line, I'd welcome the enlightenment.

But I doubt you are, judging from some of the things you've said in your comments. You might be comfortable in a teachers' lounge. (Question: would the teachers be comfortable with you?) But you wouldn't last two weeks in a serious journalism class, nor two minutes in a conversation with real journalists.


   

bvckvs
bvckvs topcommenter

@DonkeyHotay @bvckvs 

So, you think he really meant that my posts are too muted, and that I should be more aggressive about verbally bitch-slapping half-wits, eh?

bvckvs
bvckvs topcommenter

@bmarvel 

Oh, OK - so when you said "Comment is journalism" - what you really meant was they're different things and that you know the difference because you're a trained professional journalist who doesn't actually work in that, or any other, field.

Got it.


btw - I'm a graduate of the Defense Information School for Public Affairs and worked for both the military, and a Voice publication as a journalist.  I've also been published in a variety of tech journals and wrote a textbook on computer programming.  So your speculation about that was about as wrong as your speculation on just about everything else.

Chattering_Monkey
Chattering_Monkey

@bvckvs @noblefurrtexas No, you major in stupidity when you post here.  Please, I beg you, do not go into education.  Our children have a hard enough time with education as it is, we dont need people like you making it worse

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

@bvckvs ... did he mention delusional egomania and narcissism? 

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@bvckvs

...wrote a textbook on computer programming.

Such a fast-food phony. Ever read the reviews by the three people who bought your re-written instruction manual? Your brother gave it 5 stars, though.

Your resume is a list of failed endeavors and pure bullshit.

bmarvel
bmarvel topcommenter

@bvckvs I know the difference between comment and journalism, bvckvs, because I'm a reader. You don't need journalism school or even college to be a reader. Try it sometime. 

"Defense Information"and "Public Affairs" and "tech journals" and "computer programming" are no doubt good preparation for something. They are not necessarily good preparation for reading.

Chattering_Monkey
Chattering_Monkey

@bmarvel @bvckvs Bill, this is some of the greatest writing you've done here in a long time.  This BVCKS dude is out of his mind, is far beyond any help his "shrink" tries to give him.  But at least he gives us some humor and fodder to laugh at daily.  You'll also notice that he likes to post after midnight...a lot, which mean his self medications are pumping through is blood and he spews this dumb shit to this blog.  All this from a guy who supposedly educates our children.  I really hope that him being a teacher is just a figment of his imagination

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@Donk

Truth, LOL.

bvckvs, aka Sanders Kaufmann is a known and proved liar, but watch out, he also threatens physical attack online. A real badass.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...