Community Organization Says Dallas Police Miss Target When Tallying Shootings

Categories: News

south_dallas_shooting.jpg
Sky Chadde
The scene of an officer-involved shooting.
Dallas Communities Organizing for Change, which has been largely critical of the Dallas Police Department, hopes to set a higher bar for the department in how it identifies incidents when officers fire their weapons. "They don't categorize officer-involved shooting appropriately," says Stephen Benavides, the organization's spokesman.

The department, police spokesman Major Jeff Cotner says, essentially divides officer-involved shootings into two categories: hits and misses. Now, a hit is also divided into whether the person shot was injured or killed. In order to avoid confusion, Cotner says, most reports released to the media that tally up officer-involved shootings only include the hits.

For instance, a December 2013 department press release adds up the total number of hits -- injuries and kills -- between 2003 and 2012, and arrives at a total of 102.

Benavides' group doesn't think that number accurately represents what's happening in Dallas. Essentially, the organization wants more emphasis on an officer's decision to pull the trigger, not his marksmanship. Hits and misses should be counted the same.

See also: Group of Black Lawyers and Judges Seeks Dallas Police Data to Root Out Brutality

If that were the case, the number of officer-involved shootings reported in the department's press release would have been 167, not 102, according to data the organization complied into a new report on police abuse. Having all officer-involved shootings -- hits and misses -- have equal weight is the "highest bar" for the department, Benavides says.

Wrongly classifying officer-involved shootings is only one small part of the problem, though, Benavides says. The real issue, he says, is that the department has a 10-year history of violence directed toward the minority community.

According to the 2010 Census, blacks make up 25 percent of Dallas' population, and victims of police shootings are disproportionately black, according to data acquired through open records requests in the organization's report:

"The rate at which black men and women are killed by the Dallas Police far outweighs their respective representation in the population," reads one part of the report. "In 8 out of 10 years, black individuals suffered at twice the rate of the U.S. Census population. 2007 represents the high at an appalling 83.33 percent, while 2003 is the lowest at 28.57 percent."

The organization wants the Department of Justice to investigate the police for violating the black community's constitutional rights. For a city to be held accountable for violating a constitutional right, plaintiffs need to prove a city's policies led to discrimination.

"DCOC alleges that the clear pattern and practice of excessive force against blacks and Hispanics, acted and continues to act as a de-facto municipal policy," reads the report.

Also, the organization believes it has the numbers that show discrimination and justifies a DOJ investigation.

"No way you can argue this is not happening," Benavides says. "These are the numbers they [the department] gave us."


Send your story tips to the author, Sky Chadde.


My Voice Nation Help
18 comments
sbenavides888
sbenavides888

To clarify, DCOC counts an incident as an officer involved shooting when DPD reports that a shooting occurred; ie an officer fired her/his weapon, and that a race is identified in the records provided.  In our recently released report those occurrences, when both occur, regardless of whether the individual was wounded or killed, are counted as an officer involved shooting.  Anything less is a purposeful mismanagement in reporting of how and when an officer makes the decision to use deadly force.


bvckvs
bvckvs topcommenter

Author,

Did you do any follow-up on the claims to verify the level of their accuracy?  Or did you just repeat what you were told?  In my experience, activists who make such claims without presenting back-up documentation are usually just spewing bullshit.

There's a priniciple of journalistic ethics that says trust what you hear, but verify before you write.  It's a good principle to follow, even if your editor isn't enforcing it.

riconnel8
riconnel8

One word....Compstat.......research it.  NYC uses it, too.

everlastingphelps
everlastingphelps topcommenter

 "The rate at which black men and women are killed by the Dallas Police far outweighs their respective representation in the population," reads one part of the report. "In 8 out of 10 years, black individuals suffered at twice the rate of the U.S. Census population. 2007 represents the high at an appalling 83.33 percent, while 2003 is the lowest at 28.57 percent."


The problem with this is that rate black men commit crimes far outweighs their respective representation in the population as well.  We don't like talking about it, but it's there.  I don't dispute that black men are convicted at higher rates and given longer sentences, which is wrong, but the flip side of that is that by completely unbiased sources (like victim reports) black crime far outweighs white and hispanic crime, even when you control for economic factors.

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

How about this statistic:


The number of people who resist arrest compared to the number of people who resist arrest and an officer discharges their firearm.  Then break it down by ethnicity.


In order to balance out the claim of discrimination, I guess the police need to start shooting more white people.  This may necessitate the police driving through North Dallas and shooting at random people, white ones, of course.

wcvemail
wcvemail

First! and first to spot "miss target" in the headline related to shootings. We ALL see what you did there. Even if it were accidental, you can claim credit now.

bvckvs
bvckvs topcommenter

That's what I thought.


bvckvs
bvckvs topcommenter

@everlastingphelps 
Racists have been using that argument since the dawn of the nation - claiming that the fact that since black people violate laws that were designed to persecute them, proves that they're natural born criminals.

It's a line that only ever works well with folks who are EXCEPTIONALLY stupid.

wcvemail
wcvemail

@everlastingphelps

I'm guessing that you posted this knowing that the racist flag will attach, kinda like a baseball play that lets one run score but gets the out anyway.

JSSS
JSSS

@wcvemail It's really an inaccurate headline since it appears the DPD hits the target about 61% of the time!

everlastingphelps
everlastingphelps topcommenter

@bvckvs @everlastingphelps Right, math is racist.


Look, if the problem is cultural, we need to change the culture.  If the problem is genetic, then we need to work even harder on the cultural changes to beat any genetic predisposition (which is all genetics is, predisposition.)


In any case, ignoring it hurts black people the most.

ozonelarryb
ozonelarryb

That's better than the GTCSS NYPD, barely .400 against Amadou Diallo, an unarmed man rapped in a stairwell.

But this should be little comfort for DPD. Big THC problem.

wcvemail
wcvemail

@Ozone, NYPD Glocks are really cheap knock-offs, and because Bloomberg is anti-gun, they can't get the real, straight-shooting ones?

everlastingphelps
everlastingphelps topcommenter

@wcvemail Pretty much.  NYPD requires a 12 lbs trigger.  You have to pull the hell out of it just to fire the gun (no way for even a reasonably strong person to be able to squeeze it) so accuracy is non-existent.


For comparison, the standard glock trigger, carried by cops, soldiers and citizens world-wide without the sorts of problems NYPD imagines, is 5.5 lbs.  Match triggers are often as light as 3 lbs.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...